Israeli Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu has reportedly made it clear that the legislation suspending the arrest of bnei yeshiva who have not reported for military service will not return in the next government, saying the measure failed to accomplish its intended purpose. Stressing that a new approach will be taken after the elections, Netanyahu stated, “Whoever does not study Torah will enlist – or go to prison.”

Speaking during a private discussion, Netanyahu said the temporary law halting the arrests of yeshiva bochurim who had not complied with draft orders did not produce the increase in Chareidi enlistment that the government had hoped to see. According to him, the arrangement has run its course and will not be reinstated.

According to a Kan News report, Netanyahu explained that the legislation—approved during the coalition’s intensive legislative push—was designed as a short-term measure to “lower the flames and increase the number of haredi recruits.” He acknowledged, however, that the initiative ultimately failed to deliver the desired results.

Netanyahu went on to say that once the elections are over, “a broad national government will be established that will immediately pass a full enlistment law that meets the IDF’s needs.” He said the new legislation would replace the current arrangement after the effort to resolve the issue through the arrest-freeze law proved unsuccessful.

The report follows earlier claims, published about two weeks ago, that Netanyahu has been attempting to create greater political distance between himself and the Chareidi parties as Israel heads toward elections. Sources close to the prime minister reportedly believe that, as the campaign intensifies, he will continue widening that gap while taking care not to undermine the overall strength of his political bloc.

The developments also come in the wake of a July 15 ruling by Israel’s Supreme Court, which issued a conditional order preventing implementation of the law that suspended the arrest of bnei yeshiva who failed to report for military service. The justices said the legislation conflicted with previous court decisions concerning equal burden-sharing, as well as the opinions of legal and professional officials who argued that such a policy encourages draft avoidance. The matter is expected to be reviewed by an expanded panel of justices at a later date.