DUBLIN (VINnews) – Ireland has barred National Security Minister Itamar Ben-Gvir and Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich from entering the country, Irish officials announced Friday.

Prime Minister Micheal Martin said he was informed by the Justice Ministry that the two Israeli cabinet ministers are prohibited from travel to Ireland.

“Minister for Justice Jim O’Callaghan, it is my understanding, has instructed his officials to prohibit any travel into Ireland for both Minister Ben-Gvir and Minister Smotrich,” Martin told reporters.

A spokesperson for O’Callaghan confirmed the statements. Martin described the ministers’ behavior as reflecting “a desire to see the elimination of Palestinians from Palestine.”

“In my view, their behavior justifies sanctions at the EU level as well, and that’s something that we will raise,” Martin added. “Now, whether we can get sufficient support across the European Union is a different matter.”

The ban comes amid heightened tensions between Israel and several European nations critical of Israeli policies in the ongoing conflict with Palestinian terror groups.

No immediate response from the Israeli government or the ministers was reported.

A battle unfolding in Arizona could help determine whether families or technology companies pay for the massive electricity demands of artificial intelligence.

Arizona Public Service (APS), the state’s largest electric utility, is seeking approval from the Arizona Corporation Commission to increase rates on data centers by more than 45% while raising residential rates by about 16%, according to hearings that began on May 18 and continued into early June.

The proposal is part of a broader rate case APS filed in June 2025, seeking an overall 14% increase in customer rates. If approved, the utility estimates the average residential customer would pay roughly $20 more per month.

At the center of the debate are the giant data centers powering artificial intelligence and cloud computing. These warehouse-sized facilities consume enormous amounts of electricity and often require utilities to build additional power plants, substations, and transmission infrastructure.

APS argues that the companies creating that demand should pay a larger share of the costs rather than passing them on to families and small businesses.

The utility is also proposing a system of formula rates, allowing regulators to review costs annually and assign infrastructure expenses to the customer groups driving those costs. Under that approach, rapidly growing data centers could face significantly higher charges as their power consumption expands.

APS says the rate increases are necessary because the utility’s current rates are based largely on equipment costs from 2021 and 2022, while inflation has substantially increased the price of transformers, transmission equipment, labor, and other critical grid components.

The company argues that additional revenue is needed to maintain reliability during Arizona’s extreme summer heat, when air-conditioning demand reaches its highest levels.

The proposal has generated fierce opposition.

Arizona Attorney General Kris Mayes has criticized the residential increase, arguing that APS is seeking excessive profits and that customers could face smaller increases if the utility were compensated only for the actual costs required to provide reliable service.

Public hearings have drawn large crowds, with many residents, particularly seniors and those living on fixed incomes, warning that even modest increases could make summer cooling unaffordable.

The debate over data centers may ultimately become the most important part of the case.

According to the Electric Power Research Institute, data centers could account for more than 20% of Arizona’s electricity consumption by 2030. That rapid growth is forcing utilities nationwide to reconsider how electric systems are financed.

The question is simple but consequential: Should ordinary ratepayers help finance infrastructure built primarily to serve AI companies, or should those companies bear the costs themselves?

Arizona is one of the first major states attempting to answer that question directly.

The issue is drawing national attention because electric utilities across the country are facing similar challenges. Demand from artificial intelligence, cloud computing, and advanced manufacturing is increasing electricity consumption at a pace not seen in decades.

Meanwhile, major technology companies have sought to reassure regulators and consumers.

Earlier this year, Google, Meta, Microsoft, OpenAI, and Amazon Web Services joined a pledge stating that data-center expansion should not result in higher energy costs for residential customers.

Critics, however, argue that voluntary commitments may not fully address the infrastructure expenses associated with the largest AI projects.

A judge is currently reviewing testimony from more than 30 parties before issuing a recommendation to the five-member Arizona Corporation Commission, which is expected to make a final decision later in 2026.

If approved, the new rates could take effect during the second half of the year.

The outcome may reach far beyond Arizona.

As artificial intelligence continues expanding, so will its demand for electricity. Regulators nationwide are closely watching whether Arizona successfully requires data centers to pay a larger share of the costs they create—or whether those costs ultimately find their way onto household electric bills.

JBizNews Desk — Arizona

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

To have YOUR school events posted, send in your pictures to [email protected].

A transportation reform that many believed would transform the livelihoods of thousands of chareidi drivers across Israel appears headed for the scrap heap, as Finance Minister Betzalel Smotrich and senior Treasury officials are reportedly blocking the legislation over a dispute involving compensation for taxi owners.

The proposal, commonly known as the “Uber Law,” would have legalized and regulated paid ride-sharing services operated through private vehicles and smartphone applications. For thousands of chareidim who currently earn income through informal “driver” networks, the legislation was viewed as a long-awaited opportunity to operate openly and legally.

Despite passing its first reading in the Knesset, the bill has stalled completely, and its supporters now fear it may never become law.

The legislation was advanced by MKs Moshe Passal, Dan Illouz, and Eitan Ginzburg and sought to bring Israel’s growing ride-sharing market under formal regulation. It would have established safety standards, insurance requirements, government oversight, and licensing rules for drivers and companies operating in the sector.

For many in the chareidi community, however, the significance of the bill extended far beyond transportation policy.

In recent years, thousands of chareidi men have turned to private driving as a source of supplemental income. Many operate through community-based networks and messaging groups, providing transportation services with flexible schedules that allow them to combine earning a living with learning or other responsibilities. Legalization of ride-sharing services was expected to significantly expand those opportunities.

Under the proposed law, drivers would have been required to meet strict standards, including maintaining a clean criminal record, holding a driver’s license for at least four years, completing periodic training courses, and providing proof of medical fitness.

The bill’s current troubles stem from fierce opposition by the taxi industry, which argues that legalization of ride-sharing services would significantly reduce the value of taxi licenses.

The original legislation included a compensation mechanism under which taxi license holders who surrendered their licenses would receive reimbursement through a dedicated fund financed by a percentage of future ride-sharing revenues. Taxi owners rejected that arrangement, insisting on immediate compensation rather than future payments.

According to sources familiar with the discussions, former Finance Ministry Director-General Ilan Rom supported the legislation and viewed it as an important step toward increasing competition in the transportation sector. His successor, Israel Malachi, is said to oppose the measure in its current form, reflecting the position of Finance Minister Smotrich.

Transportation Minister Miri Regev and her ministry have reportedly continued to support the legislation and even expressed willingness to provide immediate compensation to taxi owners in order to break the deadlock.

In an effort to save the proposal, Regev reportedly suggested temporarily funding the compensation package from other Transportation Ministry budgets, provided the Finance Ministry later reimbursed those funds. Treasury officials reportedly rejected the idea outright.

The impasse has left supporters increasingly pessimistic.

MK Moshe Passal, who led much of the bill’s advancement through the Knesset Economic Affairs Committee, has reportedly expressed deep frustration over the situation and believes the chances of passing the legislation during the current Knesset term are rapidly diminishing.

Supporters say the collapse of the bill would represent a significant missed opportunity for thousands of Israelis who rely on ride-sharing income, particularly within the chareidi community, where flexible driving arrangements have become an important source of supplemental earnings for many families.

Even beyond the budget dispute, the proposal faces an uncertain future. While the legislation could theoretically continue in the next Knesset under Israel’s continuity provisions, doing so would require the support of a future government.

Given the Finance Ministry’s current opposition and the political hurdles facing the measure, many observers believe the next coalition may have little incentive to revive it.

If the bill ultimately dies, lawmakers would either need to restart the entire legislative process from scratch or persuade the Transportation Ministry to reintroduce the proposal as government-sponsored legislation.

For now, what many chareidi drivers viewed as a pathway to legal, regulated, and expanded ride-sharing opportunities appears increasingly unlikely to become reality.

Responding to the report, the Finance Ministry stated: “If such proposals are submitted to the Finance Ministry, they will be examined both from a professional standpoint and from a budgetary standpoint.”

{Matzav.com}

☀️ TB BARGAIN SUMMER GIVEAWAY IS HERE!

☀️ We’re giving away AMAZING prizes to 3 lucky winners! 🎉

🥇 1st Prize: $1,800 CASH
🥈 2nd Prize: Dinner for 2 at a Steakhouse
🥉 3rd Prize: Mystery Prize 👀

Entering is EASY👇

📲 Click here to follow our status:

Or click here to join one of our groups

The race to build smarter artificial intelligence may have entered a new and potentially transformative phase. According to new data released by Anthropic on June 4, the company behind the popular Claude AI assistant says its own AI systems are now writing the overwhelming majority of the software code used inside the company.

If accurate, the development represents one of the strongest signs yet that artificial intelligence is beginning to accelerate its own advancement—a concept researchers have discussed for decades but have only recently started to witness in practice.

The disclosure came in a report published by the Anthropic Institute, which detailed the company’s progress toward what researchers call recursive self-improvement, the idea that AI systems can help create better versions of themselves, which can then create even more advanced successors.

The implications extend far beyond Anthropic.

If artificial intelligence can significantly speed up its own development, the pace of technological change could accelerate dramatically, affecting industries, workers, governments, investors, and policymakers worldwide.

The headline statistic immediately captured attention.

According to Anthropic, more than 80% of the code merged into the company’s systems as of May 2026 was written by Claude, its flagship AI model.

That figure represents an extraordinary jump from just a year earlier, when AI-generated code accounted for only a small percentage of the company’s development work.

Anthropic said that since launching its internal coding tools in early 2025, the productivity of its engineers has increased dramatically.

The company estimates that a typical software engineer now produces roughly eight times more code than in 2024.

The change reflects a fundamental shift in how software is being developed.

Rather than spending most of their time writing code line by line, engineers increasingly focus on defining objectives, reviewing outputs, testing systems, and making strategic decisions while AI handles much of the actual coding.

In effect, software developers are becoming managers of AI-generated work rather than creators of every line themselves.

For decades, the idea of recursive self-improvement has occupied a central place in discussions about advanced artificial intelligence.

The concept is simple but powerful.

If an AI system becomes capable of improving the software used to build itself, it could potentially help create a smarter version of itself.

That improved version could then make further improvements, creating a cycle of increasingly rapid advancement.

Some researchers view the possibility as the pathway to revolutionary scientific breakthroughs.

Others view it as one of the greatest technological risks humanity may ever face.

Anthropic stopped short of claiming it has achieved true recursive self-improvement.

However, the company presented several examples suggesting that its systems are becoming increasingly effective at assisting software development.

According to the report, Claude’s success rate on complex, open-ended engineering tasks rose from approximately 26% to 76% over a six-month period.

On another benchmark involving code optimization, Anthropic said its most advanced experimental model achieved a 52-fold performance improvement, compared with roughly fourfold improvements typically achieved by skilled human engineers working on the same challenge.

The company also described situations where Claude appeared capable of identifying better technical solutions than researchers initially pursued.

According to Anthropic, when human teams moved in unproductive directions, Claude suggested superior alternatives approximately 64% of the time, compared with only 22% in 2024.

In one particularly striking example, the company said Claude autonomously generated and deployed more than 800 software fixes addressing a longstanding category of system errors.

Anthropic estimated that manually completing the same work could have required years of engineering effort.

For businesses, the implications are enormous.

Technology companies already face intense pressure to develop AI products faster than competitors.

If AI systems themselves become powerful productivity tools for engineers, companies that effectively deploy those tools could gain significant competitive advantages.

Faster development cycles could mean quicker product launches, lower development costs, and accelerated innovation across virtually every industry touched by software.

The impact would not be limited to technology companies.

Artificial intelligence increasingly influences healthcare, finance, manufacturing, logistics, education, entertainment, and scientific research.

A meaningful increase in the speed of AI development could ripple throughout the global economy.

For software engineers, the findings reinforce a trend already becoming visible throughout the industry.

Coding remains important, but the value of engineers is increasingly shifting toward problem-solving, architecture, strategy, oversight, and quality control.

If AI can reliably write large portions of software, the most valuable human skill may become deciding what should be built rather than how to build it.

Anthropic also highlighted AI’s growing role in software quality assurance.

According to the company, automated systems now identify approximately one-third of the production bugs that previously caused issues across parts of its infrastructure.

In other words, AI is not only writing software—it is increasingly reviewing and correcting it as well.

Despite the impressive statistics, Anthropic included several important caveats.

The company acknowledged that measuring productivity through lines of code can be misleading because more code does not necessarily mean better software.

Perhaps more importantly, Anthropic emphasized that Claude still lacks what researchers often call research judgment.

While AI may be increasingly capable of solving technical problems, it remains unclear whether it can independently determine which problems are worth solving in the first place.

That distinction may prove critical.

Generating solutions is different from identifying meaningful questions.

Anthropic stressed that true recursive self-improvement has not yet arrived.

Nevertheless, the company suggested that the possibility may be closer than many observers realize.

The report arrives as lawmakers in Washington are increasingly focused on AI oversight.

Coincidentally, the same day Anthropic released its findings, a bipartisan group of members of Congress unveiled draft legislation aimed at creating a federal framework for regulating artificial intelligence.

The timing highlights how concerns surrounding AI capability, safety, transparency, and governance are becoming central policy issues.

For investors, businesses, and policymakers alike, Anthropic’s report offers both excitement and caution.

The prospect of dramatically accelerated innovation could unlock extraordinary economic growth and technological breakthroughs.

At the same time, the speed of that progress raises questions about oversight, accountability, and society’s ability to adapt.

Whether Anthropic’s findings ultimately represent the beginning of a technological revolution or simply another milestone along AI’s development path remains uncertain.

What is becoming increasingly clear, however, is that artificial intelligence is no longer just helping humans write software.

It is beginning to help build the very systems that may define the future of technology itself.

JBizNews Desk — Technology

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

NEW YORK CITY (VINnews) – The U.S. House of Representatives on Thursday soundly rejected a controversial War Powers Resolution pushed by Jew hater Rep. Rashida Tlaib, D-Mich., aimed at ending American support for Israel’s military operations against Hezbollah in Lebanon. Among those voting to defeat the measure was Rep. Dan Goldman, D-N.Y., a steadfast supporter of Israel’s right to defend itself amid ongoing threats from Iranian-backed terrorists.

Goldman, who has consistently backed U.S. military aid to Israel in its fights against Hamas in Gaza and Hezbollah in Lebanon, opposed the resolution, which critics described as a reckless attempt to tie the hands of Israel and the U.S. in confronting radical Islamist groups. The vote failed overwhelmingly, with 324 members opposed and just 92 in favor.

In contrast, former New York City Comptroller Brad Lander, who is challenging Goldman in the Democratic primary for New York’s 10th Congressional District, publicly lamented the resolution’s defeat. Lander, who has positioned himself as a vocal critic of Israel, claimed he would have joined the Congressional Progressive Caucus in supporting the measure. He accused the U.S. and Israeli leaders of complicity in “immense suffering” in Lebanon, while downplaying the security threats posed by Hezbollah.

Lander’s comments align with his broader far-left record, including pledges to cut off military aid to Israel and characterizations of its defensive operations as potential “genocide” or “occupation.” Observers have noted Lander’s shift toward rhetoric often associated with self-hating anti-Israel elements within progressive circles, distancing himself from mainstream Jewish and Democratic support for the Jewish state’s survival against existential threats.

Goldman, by comparison, has demonstrated principled leadership by supporting aid packages that enable Israel to dismantle terrorist infrastructure in Gaza and counter Hezbollah aggression from Lebanon. His votes reflect a commitment to U.S.-Israel alliance and bipartisan recognition that weakening Israel emboldens Iran and its proxies, endangering American interests and regional stability.

The primary contest between Goldman and Lander has sharpened divisions within the Democratic Party over Israel, with Lander courting progressive and anti-Israel voices while Goldman upholds a more centrist, pro-defense stance. As the June 23 primary approaches, voters in the heavily Jewish district will decide whether to back Goldman’s steadfast support for a key ally or Lander’s embrace of policies widely viewed as harmful to Israel and detached from mainstream American foreign policy.

[Photos below] A major life-saving initiative at Yeshivas Ponevezh in Bnei Brak resulted this week in more than 1,000 new bone marrow samples being added to Ezer Mizion’s national donor registry. The large-scale campaign drew widespread attention throughout the yeshiva world, combining an extraordinary effort to help save lives with meticulous care to ensure that the yeshiva’s learning schedule remained uninterrupted.

The ambitious undertaking did not materialize overnight. It was preceded by weeks of detailed planning, logistical coordination, and educational efforts. During the lead-up to the campaign, yeshiva students participated in informational sessions explaining the significance of bone marrow matching, the simplicity of the testing process—which requires only a saliva sample—and the potentially life-saving impact it can have for patients battling cancer and other serious illnesses.

Students also raised numerous halachic and medical questions, seeking guidance from the yeshiva’s leadership. Roshei yeshiva gave the matter serious consideration and emphasized the tremendous importance of participating, describing it as a clear obligation of saving lives and an opportunity to perform one of the greatest possible acts of kindness.

Earlier in the week, a special letter signed by Rav Dov Landau and Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch was publicized, urging talmidim to take part in this vital effort of pikuach nefesh. Ponevezh Rosh Yeshiva Rav Chaim Peretz Berman stressed the importance of the initiative by personally adding a handwritten note to the letter, declaring that participation in the campaign and expansion of the donor registry was a “complete obligation.”

That unusually emphatic endorsement generated significant excitement among the student body and helped drive the overwhelming response.

To accommodate the anticipated turnout while ensuring that learning would not be disrupted, organizers erected special tents and testing stations throughout the yeshiva campus. As a result, each sample was collected in just a matter of seconds, allowing participants to return immediately to their shtenders and Gemaras without creating long lines or causing bitul Torah.

Organizers noted that the current campaign continues a longstanding tradition of life-saving efforts within the yeshiva. To date, no fewer than 15 Ponevezh talmidim have been identified as full matches and have gone on to donate bone marrow, directly saving the lives of patients in Israel and around the world.

At the conclusion of the campaign, organizers expressed satisfaction with the addition of more than 1,000 new samples to the registry, significantly increasing the likelihood of finding compatible donors for patients awaiting potentially life-saving transplants.

{Matzav.com}

ST. PETERSBURG, Russia (AP) — Russian President Vladimir Putin on Friday rejected a proposal by Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy for a face-to-face negotiation on the conflict, saying he sees “no point” in it.

Thursday’s letter, the first public message Zelenskyy has written directly to Putin since Russia sent troops into Ukraine in 2022, was a sweeping critique of the Russian leader’s 26 years in power.

Speaking at the St. Petersburg International Economic Forum, Putin described Zelenskyy’s open letter proposing the meeting as “boorish,” particularly after a May 22 drone attack on a college dormitory in the Russian-controlled Luhansk region that Moscow said killed 21 and wounded scores of others.

“Is it a way to create conditions for personal meetings and talks, or create an environment which makes any personal meetings impossible?” Putin said. “I think it’s the second.”

He said that he sees “no point” in the meeting.

Zelenskyy acknowledged shifting U.S. priorities, saying it would be wrong to simply wait for the Trump administration to return its attention to ending the fighting in Ukraine while it remains heavily focused on the Iran war.

In Washington, U.S. President Donald Trump had said it “would be great” if Putin and Zelenskyy meet.

Putin has previously offered for Zelenskyy to come to Moscow for talks, an offer that the Ukrainian leader pointedly rejected. Putin said last month he doesn’t exclude a meeting in a third country, but only when there is a deal to sign.

On Thursday, Putin again rejected Zelenskyy’s push for an immediate ceasefire, arguing that Moscow wants a comprehensive settlement, not a temporary truce.

Putin said Russia is open for a compromise on Ukraine in line with understandings reached at his last year’s summit with Trump in Anchorage, Alaska, adding that Ukraine needs to accept them to make a deal to end the conflict, now in its fifth year.

“Naturally, the Ukrainian side would like us to suspend the advances made by Russian troops,” he said. “But it would be better to end the war by agreeing to the compromises that were discussed in Anchorage.”

In a speech earlier Friday at the forum, Putin said developing countries have gained an increasingly important role in the global economy, while the share of output by Western countries has shrunk.

He accused the West of undermining the global economy and finances with unilateral sanctions. By freezing Russian assets abroad through sanctions, Western nations eroded trust in their own currencies, he said.

“The sanctions and blocking of Russia’s sovereign reserves have irreversibly impacted the standing of international currencies, the dollar and the euro,” he said. “Just like Russia, any other country could lose access to their legitimate assets in dollars or euros, as well as Western financial and payment systems.”

He alleged that high state debt had helped undermine global trust in Western institutions.

“The roots of the current global turbulence lie in the transition from a vertical, hierarchical model, which served the interests of a small number of states, to a more complex, distributed and multipolar one,” Putin said. “Russia views global changes not only as a threat but also as immense opportunities. And to capitalize on them, we aim to act swiftly and pragmatically.”

The Russian leader said the world needed a “modern, flexible and responsible financial architecture — free from risks, bans and barriers.”

Putin played down Russia’s economic slowdown and sought to emphasize its macroeconomic stability. He noted that Russia’s state debt is a fraction of that in Western countries and its budget deficit is considerably smaller, compared with the West.

The forum comes at a time when Russia’s economic outlook has clouded amid the conflict in Ukraine. The government raised taxes and increased domestic borrowing to keep its budget deficit under control.

On Thursday, Putin told heads of international media at a question-and-answer session that it was an exaggeration to say Russia’s economy was struggling. He noted that his government had taken deliberate steps to cool the economy to keep inflation under control.

Putin has used the St. Petersburg forum, likened to the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, to showcase his country’s economic advances and encourage foreign investment. While Western officials and business leaders have stayed away after Putin sent troops into Ukraine in 2022, Russia has sought guests from elsewhere to underline its declared goal of promoting a “multipolar world.”

Saudi Arabia sent a large delegation this year, and the presidents of Uzbekistan and Tanzania and vice president of China also gave speeches Friday. A U.S. official, Rodney Mims Cook Jr., head of the U.S. Commission of Fine Arts, is attending for the first time in years.

Putin on Thursday acknowledged damaging Ukrainian drone attacks inside Russia and pledged to bolster its defenses.

“To our regret, some of them break through,” Putin told the media session in talking about the drone strikes. “Russia has an air defense system, we need to improve it, strengthen it, and we will do that.”

Hours before the forum opened on Wednesday, a Ukrainian drone attack set ablaze an oil terminal in the city and also hit a nearby naval base.

Note: Images are not suitable for all audiences. Posted as community event and Hakaros Hatov.

Artificial intelligence is no longer transforming only search engines, software coding, and customer service. It is now reshaping one of the world’s oldest creative industries: music.

In one of the clearest signs yet that investors believe AI-generated music is becoming a permanent part of the entertainment landscape, Suno, the artificial intelligence music platform that allows users to create complete songs from simple text prompts, announced it has raised more than $400 million in new funding at a valuation of $5.4 billion.

The financing round, announced on June 3 by co-founder and CEO Mikey Shulman, more than doubles the company’s valuation from just six months ago, when Suno raised $250 million at a valuation of approximately $2.45 billion.

The speed of that growth is remarkable.

Few technology companies have doubled their valuation in such a short period, highlighting the extraordinary investor enthusiasm surrounding artificial intelligence and the growing belief that AI-generated content will become a major part of the global economy.

The new funding round was led by Bond Capital, whose previous investments include companies such as OpenAI, Substack, and prediction market platform Kalshi.

Additional investors included IVP, Forerunner, Union Square Ventures, Alkeon, and Quiet Capital, while existing investors including Lightspeed Venture Partners, Matrix Partners, Menlo Ventures, and Schroders Capital also participated.

Shulman disclosed that a number of artists, songwriters, and music producers invested as well, although their identities were not publicly disclosed.

Founded in Cambridge, Massachusetts, Suno has become one of the most recognizable names in AI-generated music.

The platform allows users to type simple instructions such as a song style, mood, genre, topic, or lyric concept and receive a fully generated song complete with vocals, lyrics, instruments, and production.

What once required musicians, recording studios, producers, engineers, and expensive equipment can now be accomplished in minutes.

The appeal has proven enormous.

According to company figures, Suno has surpassed 2 million paying subscribers and has become one of the most downloaded music applications in Apple’s App Store.

The platform is used by everyone from professional musicians experimenting with new ideas to complete beginners creating music for the first time.

Supporters view the technology as a revolutionary democratization of music creation.

For generations, producing high-quality music required access to expensive instruments, recording equipment, technical expertise, and industry connections.

AI dramatically lowers those barriers.

Anyone with a smartphone and an idea can now generate songs that would have been impossible for most people to create independently only a few years ago.

Yet Suno’s rapid rise has not come without controversy.

The company has become one of the central figures in an escalating legal battle over the future of artificial intelligence and intellectual property rights.

In 2024, major record labels including Warner Music Group, Universal Music Group, and Sony Music Entertainment filed lawsuits against Suno and rival AI music platform Udio, alleging copyright infringement.

The lawsuits argue that AI music systems were trained using copyrighted recordings without permission or compensation.

At the heart of the dispute is a question that extends far beyond music:

Can artificial intelligence companies legally learn from copyrighted material without obtaining licenses from the creators?

More than 1,800 independent artists have also supported class-action litigation involving AI music companies, arguing that their work was effectively used to train machines without consent.

The controversy has sparked fierce debate across the entertainment industry.

Critics argue that AI-generated music threatens to devalue human creativity by flooding the market with machine-generated content.

Many artists fear a future where synthetic songs compete directly against human musicians while relying on knowledge learned from decades of human-created recordings.

Supporters counter that technological innovation has always transformed creative industries and that AI should be viewed as a tool rather than a replacement for artists.

They argue that musicians can use AI to expand creativity, increase productivity, and reach new audiences.

Interestingly, the relationship between Suno and the music industry appears to be evolving.

Rather than continuing endless litigation, parts of the industry are beginning to explore partnerships.

Late last year, Warner Music Group settled its legal dispute with Suno and entered into a licensing agreement with the company.

The deal marked the first major-label partnership for an AI music platform and may provide a roadmap for resolving broader industry conflicts.

As part of that effort, Suno announced plans to launch a new music-generation model that would allow artists to voluntarily participate by licensing their names, voices, likenesses, and musical styles for use in AI-generated content.

If successful, such arrangements could create entirely new revenue streams for musicians while reducing legal uncertainty for AI companies.

The fresh capital will be used to expand Suno’s computing infrastructure, hire additional engineers, train more advanced AI models, and accelerate international growth.

The funding also reflects a broader investment trend.

Venture capital continues pouring into companies developing AI-generated content across music, video, writing, design, animation, and entertainment.

Investors increasingly believe artificial intelligence will become a foundational technology for creative industries in much the same way it has already become for software development.

For investors, Suno’s appeal is easy to understand.

The company has more than doubled its valuation in six months.

It has attracted millions of paying customers.

It is generating significant subscription revenue.

And it has begun establishing relationships with the very industry that once sought to shut it down.

Whether AI-generated music ultimately enhances creativity or disrupts it remains one of the biggest unanswered questions in technology and entertainment.

But one thing is becoming increasingly clear: investors are betting billions of dollars that AI-generated music is not a passing trend.

They believe it is the future.

JBizNews Desk — Technology

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

NASA mission control ordered the four astronauts of the Crew-12 mission aboard the International Space Station to enter their Crew Dragon spacecraft and don their spacesuits Friday as a precautionary measure, amid a worsening air leak in the Russian-operated Zvezda service module.

The crew — comprising two American astronauts, a French astronaut, and a Russian cosmonaut — was placed on standby for potential emergency evacuation while Roscosmos worked to address the structural breach.

Shortly thereafter, NASA spokesperson Bethany Stevens announced that Roscosmos had paused its repair efforts and that mission control had instructed the crew to stand down from safe haven procedures and return to planned operations. NASA said it looks forward to working with Roscosmos on a collaborative approach to resolving the leaks.

Three Jewish Israeli women were rescued by Palestinian Authority security forces from Bayt Jala overnight, while another Israeli man was escorted out of Qalqilya, according to the Civil Administration.

The Civil Administration said it received reports of the women wandering in Qalqilya “while endangering their well-being.” Officers from the Etzion District Coordination and Liaison office worked to protect them and coordinate their transfer.

A preliminary investigation found that the women were traveling toward Kever Rachel but made a wrong turn.

In a separate incident, a Jewish Israeli man was detained by a Qalqilya resident after allegedly attempting to pay at a store using counterfeit money. The Civil Administration said its Ephraim District Coordination and Liaison office acted to protect him and transfer him to security forces.

The four Israelis will be questioned by police, as Israelis are prohibited from entering Palestinian Authority-controlled areas of Yehudah and Shomron.

New details from the interrogation of a Gaza terrorist have shed light on how the body of IDF soldier Staff Sgt. Oron Shaul Hy”d was concealed in Gaza for more than a decade before intelligence gathered during the current war led to its recovery. The revelations were first reported by Kan News.

The terrorist, Ibrahim Hilo, a resident of Gaza, was questioned by Israel Police’s Lahav 433 major crimes unit and the Shin Bet. According to the report, Hilo initially denied any involvement in the affair but later broke down during questioning and provided investigators with extensive details.

Hilo told interrogators that during Operation Protective Edge in 2014, shortly after Oron Shaul was killed and his body was abducted, the commander of Hamas’s Shati Battalion contacted him and informed him that he was being entrusted with a “deposit.”

According to Hilo, he asked what the “deposit” was and was told it was the body of an Israeli soldier.

“I asked what the deposit was, he said the body of a soldier. He arrived with a jeep and told me, ‘Take the jeep, put the deposit in the freezer, and afterward leave the jeep in a square in Gaza with the key inside.'”

Hilo testified that he lived on the fifth floor of a building while a refrigeration business operated on the ground floor. It was there, he said, that Oron Shaul’s body was stored for years.

“I locked the freezer and kept the key with me. Only me and Abu Rashad (the commander of the Shati Battalion) knew about the freezer and the key.”

According to the investigation, Hamas operatives periodically visited the site over the years to ensure that the location remained secure and that the body was still being kept there. Hilo claimed that only a small number of individuals were aware of the arrangement and insisted that even members of his own family had no knowledge of it.

Investigators challenged that account. During the interrogation, one investigator confronted him directly, saying:

“Liar. A freezer in your home is locked for years and nobody in the house knows?”

When asked whether he feared that the IDF or Israeli security agencies would eventually discover that the body was being held at his property, Hilo replied:

“I was promised that nobody would know, and I was not afraid.”

According to his testimony, he left Gaza and relocated to Deir al-Balah five days after the October 7 massacre, while Oron Shaul’s body remained at the location where it had been hidden for years.

Hilo was later arrested during the war. Information he provided during questioning ultimately led to a significant intelligence breakthrough, paving the way for the operation that resulted in the recovery of Staff Sgt. Oron Shaul’s remains and his return to kever Yisroel.

{Matzav.com}

Gedolei Yisrael joined Thursday night in directing that the name Chizkiyahu be added for the mekubal and tzadik of Tiveria Harav Dov Kook shlita, amid concern over his deteriorating condition, according to a report in Bechadrei Chareidim.

The directive was issued by famed Mashgiach Harav Dov Segal shlita and Harav Yitzchak Zilberstein shlita, Rav of Ramat Elchanan and one of the preeminent poskim of the generation.

Adding the name of Chizkiyahu Hamelech, whose life was extended by Hashem following his heartfelt tefillah — is traditionally associated with recovery from illness.

Klal Yisroel is asked to daven for the refuah sheleimah of Chizkiyahu Dov ben Shoshanna

This post was originally published on this site.

Three kedoshei elyon had one common concept when it came to learning Torah – they were the Ohr Hachaim Hakadosh (Rabbi Chaim ibn Attar 1696-1743) when he came to Eretz Yisroel; the Ramchal (Rabbi Moshe Chaim Luzzatto 1707-1746) when he lived in Padua, Italy;  and Hagaon, Harav Chaim Volozhiner, (1749-1821) the famous talmid of the Gaon of Vilna.

They each had a yeshiva with ‘around-the-clock’ Torah learning, 24-hours a day, so that there would be no minute when the sound of Torah learning would not be heard in this world. The 24-hour period would be divided into shifts, and as one ended the next would begin.

Torah-24

A “Torah-24” Center has been opened in Yerushalayim and the Nasi is Maran Sar Hatorah, Harav Chaim Kanievsky, zt”l.

Under ONE ROOF, from 6:00 am – 6:00 am, 10 kollelim fill successive learning shifts. Each kollel focuses on a specific area of in-depth Torah study. The “Torah-24” Kollelim include: Boker (Gemora), Yerushalmi, Bavli, Zeraim-Taharot, Dalet Chelkei Shulchan Aruch, Erev (Gemora), Chatzos- Zohar/Kabbolah, Erev Shabbos (Chumash / Medrash b’iyun).

Already there are 52 avreichim metzuyonim, and a large number of candidates are vying for the remaining slots in the kollelim. All the avreichim are required to take rigorous monthly tests.

Endorsements & Letters

Endorsements include Maranan Hagaonim shlit”a: Harav Gershon Edelstein, Harav Berel Povarsky, Harav Shimon Badani, Harav Dovid Cohen, Harav Boruch Mordechai Ezrachi, Harav Chaim Feinstein, Harav Shimon Galai, Harav Shraga Shteinman.

Letters of support-encouragement have been received from Maranan Hagaonim, shlit”a: Hamekubal Harav David Bazri, Hamashpia Hagadol Reb Elimelech Biderman, Hamekubal Harav Yaakov Meir Schechter, Harav Moishe Sternbuch, Harav Yitzchak Tuvia Weiss.

For more “Torah-24” information click on: www.torah-24.com or call 718-766-5022

Brian Chesky, the billionaire co-founder and Chief Executive Officer of Airbnb, is preparing to launch a new artificial intelligence company, marking his first major move into one of the most competitive industries in the world. The development was first reported by Bloomberg on June 4, citing people familiar with the matter who requested anonymity because the plans have not yet been publicly announced.

While Chesky intends to remain CEO of Airbnb, the new venture signals that one of Silicon Valley’s most influential founders believes the current generation of AI products is missing something fundamental.

According to Bloomberg’s report, the new company will focus on developing advanced artificial intelligence models, with a particular emphasis on how people interact with AI systems. The lab remains in its early stages, and details regarding funding, leadership, staffing, and technology have not yet been finalized.

What makes the project noteworthy is not simply that another AI startup is being launched.

It is the reason Chesky appears to be doing it.

For years, Chesky has argued that artificial intelligence products have become too focused on text and not focused enough on experience.

Today’s leading AI systems generally operate through chat interfaces where users type questions and receive written responses. Chesky has repeatedly suggested that the future of AI should be far more visual, intuitive, interactive, and design-oriented.

In many ways, that perspective reflects the path that built Airbnb itself.

Before becoming one of the most successful technology entrepreneurs of his generation, Chesky studied industrial design. Design thinking became one of Airbnb’s defining competitive advantages, helping transform what began as a simple room-rental concept into a global travel platform used by hundreds of millions of people.

His reported frustration with today’s AI interfaces appears to have become the foundation for this new venture.

Unlike competitors such as Expedia and Booking Holdings, Airbnb has largely avoided integrating directly into platforms like OpenAI’s ChatGPT. Chesky has openly stated that he believes current AI tools are not yet capable of delivering the kind of travel-planning experience he ultimately envisions.

Rather than adapting Airbnb to existing AI systems, he now appears to be exploring whether AI itself should be redesigned.

For investors, the announcement generated mixed reactions.

Airbnb shares initially moved higher following the Bloomberg report before giving back those gains later in the trading session.

The hesitation reflects a common concern among shareholders whenever a high-profile founder pursues outside projects.

Investors often worry that leadership attention could become divided.

That concern may be particularly relevant in Chesky’s case.

Within Silicon Valley, he is known as one of the most hands-on chief executives in the technology industry.

His management style became so widely discussed that startup investor and entrepreneur Paul Graham popularized the phrase “Founder Mode” in 2024 to describe leaders who remain deeply involved in product development, strategy, and operations even after building massive companies.

Chesky has embraced that philosophy throughout Airbnb’s evolution.

The timing is also significant because Airbnb itself is undergoing a major transformation.

The company is no longer content being simply a marketplace for booking vacation rentals.

Chesky has repeatedly outlined a vision of Airbnb becoming a broader travel platform that could eventually handle experiences, services, transportation, local activities, and other travel-related offerings.

Executives have suggested some of these initiatives could eventually generate more than $1 billion annually in additional revenue.

Artificial intelligence is expected to play a major role in that expansion.

Chesky has spoken publicly about Airbnb’s internal use of AI tools, particularly coding assistants that allow teams to develop and test new products significantly faster than before.

According to Chesky, projects that previously required months or years can increasingly be developed in weeks.

The decision to create a separate AI lab rather than house the effort entirely within Airbnb may reveal how ambitious the project truly is.

Rather than developing AI solely for travel applications, Chesky appears to believe there is an opportunity to rethink how consumers interact with AI more broadly.

That places him in direct competition with some of the world’s most valuable and heavily funded companies.

The AI industry is currently dominated by giants including OpenAI, Google, Anthropic, Microsoft, Meta, and Amazon, all of which are investing billions of dollars annually into AI research and infrastructure.

Building cutting-edge AI models requires enormous amounts of computing power, engineering talent, and financial resources.

Even well-funded startups face significant barriers entering the field.

Yet Chesky may be making a different bet.

While many AI companies focus primarily on making models smarter, faster, and more powerful, his reported emphasis appears centered on making AI easier, more intuitive, and more enjoyable to use.

That distinction could prove important.

Technology history is filled with examples where superior design and user experience mattered just as much as raw technical capability.

For consumers, the long-term implications could be substantial.

Imagine travel planning that feels less like asking questions in a chatbot and more like interacting with a personalized digital concierge that visually understands preferences, destinations, budgets, schedules, and experiences before suggestions are even requested.

That type of experience aligns closely with the design philosophy Chesky has advocated for years.

Of course, significant challenges remain.

The company does not yet officially exist.

Funding details remain unknown.

Leadership has not been announced.

The technology roadmap is still unclear.

And competition in AI has never been more intense.

Still, the broader message is unmistakable.

One of the most successful founders of the internet era has concluded that today’s AI experience is not where it needs to be—and rather than waiting for someone else to fix it, he is reportedly building a company to try.

Whether the venture succeeds or fails, Chesky’s entry adds another powerful voice to the debate over what the next generation of artificial intelligence should look like.

JBizNews Desk — Technology

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

After several weeks of steady losses against the shekel, the U.S. dollar has begun to regain ground in recent days, fueled by growing expectations that the Bank of Israel may move more quickly to cut interest rates.

The Bank of Israel’s latest representative exchange rate was set at 2.8950 shekels per dollar, reflecting a daily increase of 0.801%. The euro also posted gains against the Israeli currency.

The primary driver behind the shift appears to be changing market expectations regarding Israeli monetary policy. Bank of Israel Governor Prof. Amir Yaron recently indicated that if inflation expectations continue to decline, it could justify a more accommodative monetary policy and potentially a faster pace of interest-rate reductions.

Investors interpreted those comments as a signal that interest rates in Israel could be lowered sooner than previously anticipated.

When markets expect interest rates to decline, the shekel often weakens because holding shekel-denominated assets becomes less attractive. That dynamic has helped the dollar recover after trading at unusually low levels in recent weeks.

Concerns among exporters and high-tech companies have also played a role. A strong shekel reduces the value of revenues earned in dollars when those earnings are converted into local currency, making fluctuations in the exchange rate especially significant for major sectors of the Israeli economy.

Despite the dollar’s recent gains, financial analysts caution that it is still too early to declare a lasting reversal in the currency trend.

A few days of strengthening do not necessarily outweigh the factors that have supported the shekel in recent months, including robust high-tech exports, strong performance in U.S. financial markets, and continued investment flows into Israel’s stock market.

The Bank of Israel is expected to continue monitoring inflation data, currency movements, and the security situation before making any further policy decisions.

For now, many market observers view the dollar’s recent rise primarily as a sharp correction following a significant decline, rather than definitive evidence of a new long-term trend in the foreign exchange market.

By Y.M. Lowy

Friday will be very hot with a high of 88 and a low of 71. Mostly sunny skies are expected throughout the day as summer-like heat settles over Boro Park.

Shabbos will be the hottest day of the weekend with a high of 92 and a low of 69. Expect hot and more humid conditions with a mix of sunshine and clouds. A breezy afternoon may bring a bit of relief from the heat.

Sunday will be slightly cooler with a high of 86 and a low of 65. It will be very warm during the morning hours before clouds and sunshine alternate through the day. A thunderstorm is possible in the area during the afternoon.

One of Hadera’s biggest real estate projects is finally moving forward, with the city signing a development agreement that clears the way for a major new mixed-use district near the train station, Route 2 and Mall Hof Village.

The project, known as Tnuport, is planned for a roughly 78-dunam site at one of the city’s most important western entrances. Instead of a sleepy edge-of-city plot, the area is being pushed into a dense urban hub: 724 apartments, a major office tower, commercial space, public buildings, education facilities and large open public areas.

panoramic landscape view Israel shoreline cities towns agriculture fields, wide angle, Mediterranean Sea.

The significance is not just the size. The plan had already been approved, but without a development agreement with the municipality, it could not move properly toward permits. That bottleneck has now been removed. Hadera Municipality and the city’s economic company are expected to lead roughly NIS 50 million in infrastructure planning and development work, including upgrades tied to roads, drainage, electricity and the wider public realm.

The residential side will include five 24-story towers, alongside lower-rise buildings. The business component is also central to the story: the plan calls for a 15-story office tower of around 27,000 square meters, plus thousands of square meters of commercial space. In total, the project is expected to bring roughly 30,000 square meters of employment, office and retail space into the area.

That matters for Hadera. Like many growing Israeli cities, it cannot rely only on adding apartments. A city that wants better services, stronger infrastructure and more local jobs needs commercial anchors. This project is being framed as exactly that: not just more housing, but a new district where residents can live, work, shop, walk and use the train without being dependent on daily commutes into Tel Aviv or Haifa.

The plan also includes around 21 dunams of open public space and more than eight dunams for public and education buildings. The official planning documents describe a neighborhood built around a central public space separated from vehicle traffic, with internal roads and parking designed to serve the residential buildings.

There is also a before-and-after story here. Earlier planning rights for the site allowed just 66 housing units, alongside commercial and public space. The new plan dramatically expands the residential footprint to 724 apartments, turning the former Tnuport industrial/packing-house area into one of Hadera’s most ambitious urban redevelopment projects.

Scenic Tel Aviv coastline seashore promenade with hotels and beaches near Old Jaffa port.

For buyers, investors and residents, the location is the strongest part of the pitch. The site sits near the railway, close to the coast, near existing retail and beside key transport arteries. That combination is exactly what Israeli planning authorities increasingly want: dense housing near transportation, with public space and employment built into the same neighborhood.

But the next stage is still execution. A signed development agreement is not the same as residents moving in. The project still has to pass through permits, infrastructure work, marketing and construction phasing. The key question now is whether Hadera can deliver the public infrastructure early enough to support hundreds of new homes without choking the area.

If built as planned, Tnuport could change the face of western Hadera. It would turn a strategic but underused site into a rail-linked urban district and give the city a new economic anchor at its entrance. For a city trying to move from commuter town to independent urban center, this is the kind of project that can actually shift the map.

LOS ANGELES (VINnews) – In a disturbing display of antisemitic vitriol that has drawn swift backlash from Jewish leaders and pro-Israel advocates, fringe California gubernatorial candidate Alicia Lapp launched her campaign with acts widely condemned as hateful incitement against Jews and the Jewish state.

Lapp, a Republican who garnered a negligible 0.1% of the vote in California’s June 2 primary, appeared in videos burning the Israeli flag and calling for the deportation — or imprisonment — of “every single Zionist,” equating support for Israel with treason.

“Zionists” in this context serves as a thinly veiled antisemitic slur targeting Jews who support their ancestral homeland’s right to exist and defend itself, a core tenet of Jewish identity for millions worldwide. Jewish organizations have long warned that such rhetoric echoes dangerous historical tropes blaming Jews for societal ills.

In one video, Lapp stood beside a burning Israeli flag while promoting her “America First” platform, falsely blaming Israel’s existence for California’s crises of homelessness, failing schools and infrastructure — a baseless conspiracy theory that deflects from the state’s own policy failures under decades of Democratic leadership.

Critics, including Jewish activists, compared her statements to those of other extremists who have called for placing Jews in camps, drawing painful parallels to the Holocaust. Lapp’s rhetoric has been slammed as pure Jew-hatred masquerading as political commentary.

California’s Jewish community, already grappling with a surge in antisemitic incidents, expressed outrage. The state recorded hundreds of antisemitic attacks in recent years, including harassment, vandalism and violence against synagogues and Jewish institutions. Leaders stress that such hateful campaigns have no place in American politics and only embolden those who wish harm to Jews.

Lapp’s poor showing at the polls reflects the American public’s rejection of such bigotry. Mainstream candidates across parties have reaffirmed support for the Jewish community and Israel’s security amid rising global threats from Iran-backed terrorists and their ideological allies.

Jewish voters and allies in California and beyond are urged to remain vigilant against antisemitism in all its forms, whether from the far-left or fringe right. Support for candidates who stand firmly against Jew-hatred and for the safety of Jewish communities remains essential.

VINnews will continue monitoring this story and the broader fight against antisemitism in American politics.

The U.S. House of Representatives voted on Wednesday, June 3, to approve a resolution that would require additional congressional authorization before the president could continue military operations against Iran, marking the strongest legislative challenge yet to a conflict that has reshaped energy markets, fueled inflation concerns, and heightened geopolitical tensions across the globe.

The vote, first reported by Reuters, represents the most significant congressional pushback since the U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran began in late February. While the measure faces significant hurdles before becoming law, its passage signals a growing desire among lawmakers to reassert Congress’s constitutional role in decisions involving war and military engagement.

At its core, the legislation is a War Powers Resolution, designed to reinforce the constitutional principle that the authority to declare and sustain war belongs to Congress rather than the executive branch alone.

Supporters of the measure argue that military operations against Iran, including actions connected to the strategic Strait of Hormuz, have expanded without a clear vote from elected representatives. They contend that a conflict with such enormous economic, military, and diplomatic consequences deserves direct congressional approval rather than relying solely on executive authority.

The resolution’s future remains uncertain.

Before taking effect, it would need approval from the U.S. Senate, where support remains far from guaranteed. Even if it were to pass both chambers, lawmakers would likely face a presidential veto, requiring a two-thirds majority in both the House and Senate to override. Given current political realities, that remains a difficult path.

As a result, the immediate impact is more political than legal.

Yet financial markets are paying close attention.

The war has become one of the most important drivers of global market activity in 2026. Every escalation in the conflict has pushed oil prices higher, increased volatility in equity markets, and created uncertainty for businesses dependent on stable energy supplies. Conversely, every sign of diplomacy or de-escalation has produced relief rallies across multiple asset classes.

The House vote arrived during a week already marked by encouraging developments for markets. Israel and Lebanon announced a ceasefire agreement, oil prices retreated from recent highs, and reports surfaced that diplomatic discussions between Washington and Tehran could continue.

Taken together, investors increasingly see a political environment that may be moving away from a prolonged military confrontation.

For businesses, predictability matters.

A conflict with no clear endpoint creates significant planning challenges for companies exposed to fuel costs, transportation expenses, international shipping, and global trade routes. The continued threat of disruption near the Strait of Hormuz, through which a significant portion of the world’s oil supply travels, has forced businesses to prepare for potential spikes in energy prices and supply chain disruptions.

Industries particularly sensitive to these developments include airlines, trucking companies, shipping firms, manufacturers, logistics providers, and energy-intensive industrial operations.

Even a symbolic congressional effort to limit the war may reduce concerns that the conflict could expand indefinitely, providing some reassurance to corporate planners and investors.

The vote also highlights a broader shift in political sentiment.

Wars are expensive, and those costs eventually appear throughout the economy. Military spending affects federal budgets, higher oil prices contribute to inflation, and uncertainty can weaken investment and consumer confidence. As the conflict has continued and energy costs have remained elevated, lawmakers from both parties have faced increasing pressure from constituents concerned about economic consequences at home.

The fact that the resolution secured enough support to pass the House is noteworthy given the deep divisions that have characterized Congress in recent years.

What happens next may be nearly as important as the vote itself.

If the Senate chooses to debate the measure, it would intensify pressure for a diplomatic resolution. Markets often react not only to actual policy changes but to the likelihood of future outcomes. Investors constantly assess probabilities, and congressional resistance to an open-ended conflict alters those calculations.

The diplomatic backdrop further reinforces that dynamic.

Reports suggesting continued communication between U.S. and Iranian officials have raised hopes that negotiations could eventually reduce tensions. A Congress openly signaling discomfort with an extended military campaign may strengthen advocates of diplomacy while making any significant expansion of military operations more politically difficult.

For ordinary Americans, the consequences remain largely economic.

The conflict has contributed to elevated energy prices throughout the year. Higher fuel costs affect everything from gasoline prices to airline tickets, shipping expenses, food costs, and household budgets. If congressional pressure ultimately contributes to a faster end to hostilities, consumers could eventually benefit through lower energy costs and reduced inflationary pressure.

Few observers expect the resolution to become law in its current form. The Senate remains uncertain, and the mathematics of overriding a veto remain daunting.

Still, the House vote sends a powerful signal.

Whether it ultimately changes policy or not, it demonstrates that the political center of gravity may be shifting toward limiting the conflict rather than expanding it. Businesses, investors, and energy markets are already beginning to incorporate that possibility into their outlooks.

The coming weeks will determine whether the vote represents a symbolic protest or the beginning of a broader effort to reshape America’s role in the conflict. Either way, the message from the House was clear: support for an open-ended war is no longer a given, and the debate over how the conflict should end is now moving to the center of American politics.

JBizNews Desk — Washington

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

By M.C. Millman 

In a significant development for local voters, Boro Park will have a new polling site, bringing a convenient voting location directly into the heart of the neighborhood. 

The new poll site will open at the BPJCC Community Center, which recently opened at 5102 13th Avenue. The center, made possible by the support of Metropolitan Commercial Bank, provides residents with a spacious, ADA-compliant facility where eligible voters can cast their ballots during the early voting period leading up to Election Day and on Election Day itself. 

The addition of a local early voting site is expected to make it easier than ever for Boro Park residents to participate, eliminating the need to leave the neighborhood to vote before Election Day. 

The effort to secure the site was led by District Leader Pinny Ringel, who worked closely with the Board of Elections and community stakeholders throughout the process. 

"Bringing a centrally located voting site in the heart of Boro Park is a milestone that breaks down unnecessary barriers to the ballot box”, said Assemblyman Simcha Eichenstein. “By providing flexible options closer to home, we ensure that every neighbor- regardless of their work schedule or caregiving duties- has a fair and convenient voice in shaping our future. Thank you to District Leader Pinny Ringel for helping to bring this important upgrade to Boro Park. Thank you as well to the NYC Board of Elections and BPJCC for their partnership and collaboration in bringing this to fruition.” 

“I worked closely with Assemblyman Simcha Eichenstein and the Board of Elections to establish this new polling site in the heart of Boro Park,” said District Leader Pinny Ringel. “This achievement reflects what can be accomplished when elected officials, community leaders, and city agencies work together to deliver meaningful results for our district. I want to thank Assemblyman Eichenstein for his steadfast partnership and advocacy, as well as the Board of Elections for approving an additional polling location for our community. I also want to thank the BPJCC and its CEO, Avi Greenstein, for partnering with us and making their beautiful new center available as a polling site. Expanding access to the ballot box is fundamental to a strong democracy, and bringing a polling site directly into the center of our neighborhood will make voting more convenient, increase civic participation, and ensure that the voices of Boro Park residents are heard loud and clear.” 

“The importance of voting cannot be overstated,” said Avi Greenstein, CEO of BPJCC. “Our community’s voice deserves to be heard, and having an accessible voting location in the center of Boro Park makes civic participation easier than ever. We encourage every eligible voter to take advantage of this opportunity and make their voice count.” 

“Bringing an early voting site to Borough Park means every resident, every family, every worker, every voice in this community has a fair and convenient opportunity to make themselves heard,” said Senator Sam Sutton. “Democracy only works when we show up, and I urge each and every one of you to cast your ballot and help shape the future of our neighborhood and our city.” 

“It’s a mitzvah for every person to vote, and now, with an early voting site in the heart of Boro Park, no one has an excuse,” said Councilman Simcha Felder. “I commend the BPJCC for their efforts to make this a reality, and I look forward to seeing a huge turnout on Election Day.”

The new location is expected to serve thousands of voters and represents a major expansion of voting access in one of Brooklyn’s largest communities. Residents are encouraged to check their voter registration status and review their Board of Elections mailer to confirm their polling information ahead of the upcoming election cycle. 

BPJCC also plans to launch a community-wide voter awareness campaign to encourage eligible residents to use the new voting location and participate in the electoral process. 

The poll site will operate from June 13 through June 21 for early voting and will also be open on Election Day, Tuesday, June 23. 

Voters can also check their polling site location online at vote.nyc/page/find-your-poll-site.

A heated debate erupted Thursday night during a meeting of Israel’s security cabinet as several ministers voiced opposition to a proposed ceasefire arrangement with Lebanon, while Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu clarified that no agreement currently exists because Hezbollah has not accepted the terms.

The discussion came after the United States announced details of a proposed framework following talks between Israeli and Lebanese representatives in Washington.

Under the reported proposal, the sides would establish a series of “pilot zones” in southern Lebanon under the exclusive control of the Lebanese Army. Implementation would be contingent upon a complete cessation of hostilities and the removal of all Hezbollah operatives from areas south of the Litani River.

Despite the framework, no vote on approving a ceasefire took place after Hezbollah Secretary-General Naim Qassem publicly rejected the proposal, including its requirement that Hezbollah halt its attacks.

According to a Ynet report, IDF Chief of Staff Lt. Gen. Eyal Zamir attended only the opening portion of the meeting and spoke little during the discussion. During the session, ministers received news of the death of armored corps officer Capt. Eitan Shmuel Lamberg, Hy”d, in southern Lebanon, a development that further hardened opposition among several cabinet members.

At the start of the meeting, Netanyahu updated ministers on the status of negotiations and emphasized that no agreement was currently on the table.

“If Hezbollah agrees, I will bring the ceasefire agreement to you for approval. At the moment there is no agreement. Hezbollah opposes it, and therefore I am not bringing it for a decision,” Netanyahu said.

The prime minister’s remarks sparked a sharp exchange among ministers. Energy Minister Eli Cohen argued that Israel’s response to Hezbollah attacks has been insufficient.

“We need to tell ourselves the truth. For attacks like these, any normal country would have smashed them,” Cohen said.

Minister Ze’ev Elkin pointed to what he described as Lebanon’s unwillingness to move forward with a ceasefire.

“The other side does not want a ceasefire. We can wait a little longer, but we must respond,” Elkin said.

Settlement Minister Orit Strock called for territorial changes along the northern border, saying Israel should “change the border” and move in that direction.

Minister Yitzchak Wasserlauf recounted a conversation with his son regarding the proposed ceasefire.

“My son asked me what this ceasefire is. I told him, during a food break you eat, during a ceasefire they shoot. We cannot keep trying to satisfy the Americans. Time is not on our side,” Wasserlauf said.

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir urged Netanyahu to present the human cost of the conflict directly to President Donald Trump.

“Go to the United States and take children from Kiryat Shmona and Metula with you. Tell Trump: We love you, but we must strike Hezbollah’s weak points in Dahieh, and even if there is an escalation, there must be a military maneuver. He’ll get over it. Our soldiers are more important,” Ben Gvir said.

In contrast, Finance Minister Betzalel Smotrich offered a more supportive assessment of the proposed arrangement.

“A ceasefire under these circumstances would be a tremendous achievement,” Smotrich argued.

Earlier Thursday, Hezbollah leader Naim Qassem formally rejected the understandings reached between Israel and Lebanon, which would have required Hezbollah to stop firing and withdraw from territory south of the Litani River.

“The result of the direct, humiliating and disgraceful negotiations is rejected by broad segments of the Lebanese people,” Qassem said.

He further declared that Hezbollah would not agree to any ceasefire while Israeli troops remain in Lebanon.

“The Washington declaration conditions the basic principles that America and Israel want — toward subjugating Lebanon to the Greater Israel project.”

Shortly after Qassem’s speech, sirens warning of a hostile aircraft intrusion sounded in several communities in the western Galilee. A Hezbollah drone later exploded near Shlomi, roughly twenty minutes after Prime Minister Netanyahu and Defense Minister Yisroel Katz had departed the area following a meeting with local municipal leaders.

{Matzav.com}

Stocks opened lower Friday, June 5, after the U.S. Bureau of Labor Statistics reported that the economy added 172,000 jobs in May — more than double what economists expected — sending bond yields higher and giving the Federal Reserve fresh reason to keep interest rates where they are. The unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, as expected, while average hourly earnings rose 0.3% for the month and 3.4% over the past year. The report landed on top of a second straight day of selling in chip stocks, pressure from the ongoing U.S.-Iran conflict, and a sharp drop in Bitcoin, leaving Wall Street with a rough open to end a nine-week winning streak.

In late-morning trading, the S&P 500 was down about 0.6% and the Nasdaq Composite fell roughly 1.1%, dragged lower by technology and semiconductor names. The Dow Jones Industrial Average barely moved, edging up less than 0.1% and holding near the record high it set Thursday. The Russell 2000 bucked the trend, rising about 1.4% as money moved out of big technology companies and into other corners of the market.

Good News Treated as Bad News

The jobs number was the morning’s main event, and the market’s reaction shows how unusual the current environment remains. A strong labor market is normally something investors welcome. But with inflation still elevated, traders interpreted stronger-than-expected hiring as another reason the Federal Reserve may keep interest rates higher for longer.

Treasury yields moved sharply higher following the report, weighing on stocks.

The details strengthened the picture further. The Bureau of Labor Statistics revised March payroll growth up by 29,000 to 214,000 and April up by 64,000 to 179,000, leaving the two months a combined 93,000 jobs higher than previously reported.

Job gains were led by leisure and hospitality, which added 70,000 positions, followed by local government with 55,000, health care with 35,000, and manufacturing with 7,000.

“The third consecutive consensus-beating gain in nonfarm payrolls in May should further reduce concern among the FOMC about the downside risks to the labor market,” said Stephen Brown, Chief North America Economist at Capital Economics, noting that stronger hiring makes it more difficult for policymakers to overlook persistent inflation pressures.

The numbers arrive less than two weeks before the Federal Reserve’s June 16–17 policy meeting.

Chip Selling Spreads After Broadcom

The other major force pulling stocks lower was a second day of weakness across semiconductor shares.

The selloff began Thursday after Broadcom reported strong results but did not raise its full-year forecast for artificial-intelligence chip sales. Chief Executive Hock Tan reiterated guidance for AI semiconductor revenue exceeding $100 billion and said the company would focus on selling chips rather than complete integrated systems.

By Friday morning, the weakness had spread across the sector.

Micron Technology fell about 3.3%, while Intel and Advanced Micro Devices each dropped roughly 2.8%. Nvidia slipped about 1.4%.

Among AI infrastructure companies, Dell Technologies and Super Micro Computer each lost around 2.7%, while optical-networking supplier Lumentum Holdings declined approximately 3.5%.

Despite the pullback, analysts largely characterized the move as a pause rather than a fundamental shift in the AI investment story.

KeyBanc Capital Markets raised its price target on Broadcom to $575 from $500, while Bernstein analyst Stacy Rasgon said the company’s long-term growth outlook remains intact despite near-term concerns.

War, Oil and Bitcoin Remain in Focus

The conflict involving Iran continued to hover over markets.

Brent crude oil traded near $95 a barrel Friday, slightly higher on the day. While prices have eased from recent highs, crude remains well above levels seen before tensions escalated earlier this year.

Meanwhile, Bitcoin fell roughly 3.5% to around $61,900, adding to a difficult week for digital assets amid continued outflows from cryptocurrency investment funds.

For investors, the challenge remains straightforward. The economy appears stronger than expected, but that strength may reduce the likelihood of near-term Federal Reserve rate cuts just as the artificial-intelligence trade that powered much of this year’s rally takes a breather.

JBizNews Desk — Wall Street

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

California’s appellate court granted Kars4Kids a win yesterday, allowing it to continue running its iconic jingle on radio and TV in the state. Kars4Kids is a national nonprofit that uses proceeds from car donations for youth, educational, and mentoring programs, largely through its sister charity Oorah. The Court agreed to Kars4Kids’ request for a stay of the lower court’s injunction barring it from airing its current ads in California while the organization pursues an appeal of that ruling.

“Kars4Kids applauds today’s court ruling,” a Kars4Kids spokesperson said. “Kars4Kids’ programs benefit children and teenagers in California and throughout the country. The uninterrupted airing of its ads will enable the charity to continue funding those programs.”

The May 8th court opinion based its decision on what Kars4Kids calls a misrepresentation of the charity and its work, as detailed on the Kars4Kids website.

“We believe the lower court’s findings on the facts and the law were deeply flawed, and we are pursuing a broad appeal of that decision,” the spokesperson said.

{Matzav.com}

Iranian Foreign Minister Abbas Araghchi said that communication with Iran’s supreme leader, Mojtaba Khamenei, remains ongoing and that government officials are carefully following his directives, underscoring his continued role in guiding Tehran’s policies, including negotiations with the United States.

Araghchi’s remarks came after he confirmed that indirect talks with the United States have continued through intermediaries despite the absence of a final agreement.

He stressed that communication channels with Khamenei remain active and functioning, adding that “Khamenei’s instructions reach the government on time.” The statement appeared to push back against comments from U.S. officials who have suggested that difficulties communicating with Iran’s leadership have slowed the negotiation process and delayed responses from Tehran.

Araghchi further emphasized that Iran’s political leadership is acting in full accordance with Khamenei’s directives. His comments indicate that the decision to continue negotiations with Washington has been made with Khamenei’s approval, despite the Iranian leader’s criticism of the United States and Israel.

Just one day earlier, Khamenei accused the two countries of attempting to divide the Iranian people, saying that “the United States and Israel are trying to sow division among Iranians.”

Addressing maritime security, Araghchi also stated that Iran and the Sultanate of Oman would coordinate the management of the strategically vital Strait of Hormuz in accordance with international law.

Mojtaba Khamenei has not appeared publicly since being selected in March to succeed his father, Ali Khamenei, who was killed on the first day of the war with Iran on February 28. His health and status have remained the subject of speculation, raising questions about the extent of his control over the country. Nevertheless, reports continue to point to his growing involvement in government affairs and major policy decisions.

President Donald Trump said last Wednesday that Khamenei’s son is “definitely involved” in the ongoing negotiations.

Secretary of State Marco Rubio echoed that assessment earlier in the week, saying Tuesday that “there are signs that he is becoming increasingly involved at some level.”

Iranian President Masoud Pezeshkian and Ali Abdollahi, commander of Khatam al-Anbiya, the central operational headquarters of Iran’s armed forces, have both previously confirmed meeting with Mojtaba Khamenei. However, no photographs from those meetings have been released publicly.

To date, Khamenei’s public communications have been limited to written statements. His latest message was issued Thursday and read during a ceremony marking the 37th anniversary of Ayatollah Khomeini’s death. In the statement, he called on Iranians “to confront the malicious intentions of the enemies,” a reference to the United States and Israel.

{Matzav.com}

The U.S. economy added jobs at a modest pace in May amid uncertainty surrounding the impact of conflict in the Middle East on the labor market.

The Bureau of Labor Statistics on Friday reported that employers added 172,000 jobs in May. That figure is above the estimates of economists polled by LSEG, who predicted a gain of 85,000 jobs.

The unemployment rate held steady at 4.3%, which was in line with the expectations of LSEG economists.

Revisions were made to the payroll numbers for the prior two months, with March revised up by 29,000 from a gain of 185,000 to a gain of 214,000; while April’s report was revised up by 64,000 from a gain of 115,000 to 179,000.

Taken together, employment in March and April was 93,000 jobs higher than previously reported.

HOW AI EXPOSURE IS RESHAPING JOBS IN CREATIVE FIELDS

Private payrolls added 120,000 jobs in May, well above the LSEG poll’s prediction of 85,000 jobs. April’s gain of 123,000 jobs was revised up to 177,000 jobs, while March’s gain of 190,000 jobs was revised up to 202,000.

Government payrolls grew by 52,000 jobs in May. Local government accounted for most of the gain, adding 55,000 jobs for the month compared with 1,000 jobs added by the federal government. Those gains were partially offset by a decline of 4,000 jobs in state government.

The manufacturing sector added 7,000 jobs in May, topping the gain of 2,000 jobs expected by LSEG economists.

Healthcare added 35,000 jobs in May, roughly in line with the average monthly gain of 38,000 jobs over the past 12 months. Most of those gains occurred in ambulatory healthcare services (+26,000) and in hospitals (+6,000).

Social assistance added 12,000 jobs in May, mainly in individual and family services (+10,000). The sector has added an average of 17,000 jobs per month over the last year.

The financial activities sector shed 22,000 jobs in May and the sector is down by 107,000 jobs from a recent peak in May 2025. Most of the job losses occurred at insurance carriers (-11,000) and commercial banking (-3,000).

GET FOX BUSINESS ON THE GO BY CLICKING HERE

Dozens of chareidi protesters blocked Highway 1 near Sha’ar Hagai overnight into Friday, protesting the arrest of a yeshiva bochur who had been classified as a draft evader. The demonstration caused significant traffic congestion before police dispersed the protesters using stun grenades and reopened the roadway.

The protest was sparked by the arrest of Nesanel Amsili, a talmid at Yeshivas Derech Hashem, who was detained by military police. The highway remained clogged with traffic for an extended period as demonstrators blocked the road.

Clashes broke out at the scene between motorists and protesters. Some drivers confronted the demonstrators and attempted to clear a path through the massive traffic backup that had formed.

After approximately an hour of roadblocks and disturbances, large police forces arrived and moved to break up the protest. Officers used stun grenades to disperse the crowd, after which traffic resumed on the highway.

The demonstration comes amid ongoing tensions surrounding the arrest of yeshiva students over military draft issues. Protest organizers argue that yeshiva bochurim have been subjected to increasing enforcement efforts by legal authorities, the military, and police.

Earlier this week, extremist protesters demonstrated outside the home of Supreme Court Justice Noam Sohlberg in the community of Alon Shvut, protesting the enlistment of yeshiva students. Police detained approximately 60 suspects during that demonstration.

Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu condemned the protest outside Justice Sohlberg’s home, calling for strict enforcement against those involved.

“Law enforcement authorities must exhaust the full severity of the law against the rioters,” Netanyahu wrote.

WASHINGTON (VINnews) – Sen. Chris Van Hollen, D-Md., on Friday criticized heavy spending by AIPAC and crypto-linked groups in the crowded Democratic primary to replace retiring Rep. Steny Hoyer, saying outside interests are attempting to purchase the congressional seat.

“I think voters need to be aware that these outside groups do not have the voters’ interests at heart,” Van Hollen said during a press conference.

His remarks came days after the American Israel Public Affairs Committee’s super PAC, the United Democracy Project, poured more than $1 million into television ads supporting Adrian Boafo, a Maryland state delegate. Boafo has been endorsed by Hoyer and other prominent state Democrats.

The primary race in Maryland’s 5th Congressional District has drawn significant outside spending as multiple candidates vie to succeed Hoyer, a longtime Democratic leader who announced his retirement. Van Hollen highlighted what he described as AIPAC and crypto-linked expenditures influencing the contest.

The United Democracy Project has aggressively backed candidates aligned with pro-Israel positions in Democratic primaries across the country. Boafo’s campaign has welcomed the support as it competes in a field of several Democratic hopefuls.

Van Hollen’s comments reflect growing tensions within the Democratic Party over the role of super PACs and large donors in congressional races, particularly those tied to foreign policy and emerging industry interests.

No immediate response was available from the United Democracy Project or Boafo’s campaign.

After weeks of Republican infighting over a controversial settlement fund tied to President Trump, the Senate approved a $70 billion spending package for Immigration and Customs Enforcement and the Border Patrol in the early hours of Friday morning.

The legislation cleared the chamber on a 52-47 vote shortly before 5 a.m. following an overnight series of amendment votes known as a “vote-a-rama.” Among the defeated proposals was an amendment from Sen. Bill Cassidy (R-La.) that sought to divert money from the settlement fund to law enforcement officers injured during the Jan. 6, 2021, Capitol riot.

The bill now heads to the House, where lawmakers are expected to consider it next week.

What Republican leaders hoped would be a straightforward vote centered on border enforcement instead turned into a prolonged internal battle over a $1.776 billion settlement fund established to compensate alleged victims of government weaponization.

For much of Thursday, GOP senators sparred over efforts to eliminate the fund, despite assurances from acting Attorney General Todd Blanche earlier in the week that the program would not move forward.

“This would have been done several hours ago if we weren’t having to deal with some of the issues around the fund,” Senate Majority Leader John Thune (R-SD) told reporters shortly before midnight Thursday.

The settlement fund emerged from an agreement resolving Trump’s lawsuit against the IRS over the disclosure of his tax returns to the New York Times. The newspaper published details from those returns in a September 2020 report examining Trump’s finances.

Although Thune publicly criticized the settlement fund, he spent weeks urging fellow Republicans to keep the border security bill narrowly tailored and avoid attaching provisions that might jeopardize its chances in the House.

Nevertheless, several Republican senators continued pressing for legislative action to prevent the settlement payouts, extending the fight well into the night.

Their push intensified after Trump cast uncertainty on the matter Wednesday afternoon, saying the settlement remained significant while declining to say whether it had been abandoned.

“That settlement is “very important” and “I don’t know” whether it is dead or on hold.

“I’d have to ask the lawyers,” he said.

The Senate’s first vote Thursday morning focused on an amendment offered by Senate Minority Leader Chuck Schumer (D-NY) to prohibit the settlement fund. The measure remained open for hours before ultimately failing by a 50-49 margin. Republican Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Jon Husted of Ohio, and Dan Sullivan of Alaska joined Democrats in support.

Lawmakers later overwhelmingly defeated a second proposal from Sen. Thom Tillis (R-NC) that would have eliminated the settlement fund and redirected the money to a Justice Department anti-fraud initiative.

“If Blanche says this is largely inoperative, why not use this moment to codify that?” said Tillis, who is retiring rather than seeking another term this fall. “Otherwise, you’re exposing every one of our members who are in cycle to having to deal with this between today and Election Day, and that makes no sense for something that the DOJ says they’re not moving forward with.”

Cassidy’s amendment, which would have provided compensation to police officers injured during the Capitol riot, also failed on a 52-47 vote. The proposal highlighted concerns that individuals involved in the Jan. 6 attack could potentially qualify for payments under the settlement arrangement.

Cassidy argued that despite Blanche’s assurances, the settlement remained legally active and “absolutely can be used.”

Another unsuccessful amendment would have barred any payments to Jan. 6 defendants who assaulted law enforcement personnel during the riot.

Schumer sharply criticized Republicans for defeating the proposals, warning that Senate action left taxpayers with little more than assurances from Trump’s legal team.

“leaving taxpayers to rely on nothing more than a promise from Donald Trump’s personal fixer. That is not accountability. That is a permission slip.”

Passage of the legislation would bring an end to a funding standoff that began after two anti-ICE protesters were fatally shot by federal agents in Minnesota earlier this year.

Democrats had insisted that any new funding for the Department of Homeland Security be paired with policy changes governing immigration enforcement. Their demands included clearer identification requirements for federal officers, expanded use of judicial warrants, and additional oversight measures.

Following the Minnesota incident, Trump agreed to separate Homeland Security funding from a broader spending package that was eventually enacted. However, negotiations between the parties failed to produce an agreement on immigration enforcement reforms.

As a result, funding for portions of the department expired in mid-February, with no compromise in place.

Congress later approved funding for the remainder of the Department of Homeland Security at the end of April with Democratic support, but ICE and Border Patrol operations have continued without regular appropriations ever since.

{Matzav.com}

By JBizNews Desk

Federal officials cut off funding to Hawaii’s Medicaid anti-fraud program on Thursday, June 4, making it the first state formally penalized in the Trump administration’s nationwide crackdown—and a warning shot to every other state in the country.

Federal Trade Commission Chairman Andrew Ferguson, a co-chair of the White House anti-fraud task force, announced the decertification at a press conference in Ohio, saying Hawaii had shown an “abject failure” to enforce state and federal law against fraud.

The move marks the first time a state has lost certification under the administration’s escalating effort to force stricter Medicaid fraud enforcement nationwide.

Why It Matters

Every state that participates in Medicaid is required to maintain a Medicaid Fraud Control Unit (MFCU), typically overseen by the state attorney general, to investigate fraud and abuse involving Medicaid funds.

Federal officials warned that ineffective enforcement can put broader federal Medicaid funding at risk.

That means the consequences may extend beyond Hawaii’s fraud unit itself.

The administration is signaling that states receiving billions in federal health-care dollars must actively police fraud or risk losing federal support.

Why Hawaii Was Targeted

Federal officials cited Hawaii’s performance as the worst in the nation.

According to the administration, Hawaii’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit received approximately $3 million annually in federal funding yet produced zero criminal Medicaid fraud indictments between 2022 and 2025.

During the same period:

• Medicaid enrollment reportedly increased roughly 40%
• Medicaid funding increased approximately 27%
• No fraud-related criminal indictments were filed

March Bell, Inspector General for the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services, notified Hawaii Attorney General Anne Lopez of the decertification, citing the lack of arrests, prosecutions, and convictions.

A Warning to Every State

The action follows months of pressure from Washington.

In May, federal officials sent notice letters to the attorneys general of all 50 states, demanding stronger cooperation in investigating and prosecuting Medicaid fraud.

Hawaii is simply the first state to face direct consequences.

Administration officials say additional states could face similar actions if they fail to strengthen fraud enforcement efforts.

The Ohio Case That Helped Trigger the Announcement

The decertification announcement came alongside a broader federal fraud sweep unveiled Thursday.

According to the Justice Department, investigators uncovered a multimillion-dollar Medicaid scheme involving children’s mental-health services in Ohio.

Authorities allege that services were medically unnecessary, improperly billed, or never provided as represented.

Investigators say that after one provider lost credentialing with the Ohio Department of Mental Health and Addiction Services, claims continued to be submitted through another entity.

Federal authorities seized approximately:

• $469,000 from three bank accounts
• 14 vehicles worth roughly $800,000

Among the seized vehicles:

• Six Mercedes-Benz vehicles
• Bentley
• BMW
• Jaguar
• Maserati
• Two Land Rovers
• GMC
• McLaren

Acting Attorney General Todd Blanche announced the prosecutions and said the FBI will launch a new “Most Wanted Fraudsters” list as part of the broader initiative.

Not All States Are Being Treated the Same

While Hawaii became the first state penalized, administration officials highlighted states they view as models for cooperation.

Ferguson specifically praised Ohio Attorney General David Yost, citing recent charges against 14 individuals connected to approximately $50 million in alleged fraud schemes.

The message from Washington was clear:

States that actively cooperate with federal investigations are being publicly recognized, while those that fail to do so face increasing scrutiny.

What It Means for Health-Care Providers

The crackdown has major implications for several sectors of the health-care industry.

Federal investigators are focusing heavily on:

• Behavioral health providers
• Children’s mental-health programs
• Home-health agencies
• Hospice providers
• Durable medical equipment suppliers

These sectors are often viewed by regulators as higher-risk because billing can be difficult to verify and new providers can enter the market relatively quickly.

Companies operating in these areas face:

• Increased credentialing reviews
• Greater audit risk
• Potential payment freezes
• Possible removal from Medicaid programs

State governments also face growing pressure because Medicaid relies heavily on federal funding support.

Critics Push Back

The administration’s approach has drawn criticism.

In April, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services acknowledged to The Associated Press that it had made significant errors in data used during a fraud investigation involving New York.

Several Democratic governors have argued that portions of the broader enforcement campaign are politically motivated.

Supporters counter that Medicaid fraud remains a serious national problem.

Administration officials have cited estimates placing annual Medicaid fraud losses as high as $100 billion, pointing to weak provider verification systems and years of inadequate enforcement in some states.

The Bigger Message

What makes Thursday’s action significant is that federal officials moved beyond warnings.

Until now, Washington largely relied on letters, audits, payment delays, and public pressure.

By decertifying Hawaii’s Medicaid Fraud Control Unit, the administration demonstrated a willingness to impose direct penalties.

With warning letters already sent to every attorney general in the country, Hawaii has become the first example of what federal officials say can happen when states fail to meet enforcement expectations.

JBizNews Desk — Healthcare & Government

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

Extensive preparations are underway for next week’s Keren Olam HaTorah gathering in Lakewood, where organizers are expecting attendance to exceed 30,000 people.

An organizer involved with the planning told TLS that a tremendous emphasis is being placed on accommodating the anticipated crowds while ensuring the safety and comfort of all attendees. Enhanced fencing, crowd-control measures, and other safety-related infrastructure are being implemented as part of the extensive preparations.

The event is being designed to accommodate men, women, and children, with special screens planned throughout the venue to allow attendees in various sections to participate in the program.

Eli Friedman of EF Productions is coordinating the event in conjunction with Township agencies and local organizations. Organizers say numerous entities are working hand-in-hand to ensure the gathering is both safe and inspirational for the thousands expected to attend.

Meanwhile, Township officials, law enforcement, emergency responders, and event planners continue to finalize logistical details, including street closures, traffic management plans, and designated parking arrangements for the many buses expected to transport yeshiva students to the event.

Additional details regarding road closures, transportation plans, and attendance guidelines are expected to be released as the event approaches.

Iran’s supreme leader broke months of silence Thursday with a written declaration that his country had defeated the United States and Israel, a claim that landed amid stalled negotiations, fresh violence across the region, and growing questions about whether the man issuing it remains in control.

“The malicious enemy has been defeated in its confrontation with the Armed Forces,” the statement attributed to Ayatollah Mojtaba Khamenei declared. “Since it has received a decisive blow both in military combat and in [Iran’s] public squares and streets, it’s experiencing a profound, significant humiliation.”

The circumstances of the message’s delivery told their own story. Khamenei has not been seen in public since being wounded in the strikes that killed his father and predecessor, Ali Khamenei, in the opening salvo of the US-Israeli bombing campaign on February 28. Every June 4 since 1989, the elder Khamenei had personally delivered the speech marking the death of the Islamic Republic’s founder, Ayatollah Ruhollah Khomeini. This year, an empty chair bearing his portrait stood at the mausoleum while a prayer leader read the message aloud.

The triumphant tone contrasted sharply with the state of play. Iran’s own government reported “no tangible progress” in negotiations to end the conflict, and weeks of talks marked by threats and flare-ups of violence have failed to produce a deal to end the war and reopen the Strait of Hormuz, a key conduit for global energy flows.

Analysts noted the message may be aimed less at Washington than at Iranians themselves. Khamenei accused the enemy of seeking to “plant the seeds of doubt, despair, fear, mistrust and division” among the public, and called for unity to “neutralize their sinister plot.”

The unexpected victory proclamation may signal an approaching peace deal, for which he appears to be preparing the Iranian nation. A leader who has declared the war won can more easily sign the agreement that ends it.

Washington, meanwhile, is speaking in two voices. President Donald Trump again voiced optimism, telling reporters a deal “could happen” soon, and reports indicate the administration is demanding the signing of a deal in Geneva next week. But Trump also told reporters Thursday that the US does not need an agreement at all to secure Iran’s enriched uranium stockpile, saying America could “get it right now” and that the material is “entombed” under constant surveillance. The Wall Street Journal reported this week, citing US officials, that Trump told aides he will only end the ceasefire with Iran if Tehran kills American troops.

The gaps between the sides remain wide. Tehran insists any arrangement must address the Israel-Hezbollah conflict in Lebanon, and is demanding access to “liquid cash” from billions in frozen assets as part of the first phase of any agreement. Intermediaries have spent days trying to bridge the differences. Washington is pressing Iran to reopen Hormuz, curb nuclear activity, and address its highly enriched uranium stockpile.

The political ground in Washington is shifting as well. The US House of Representatives passed a resolution seeking to halt American military action in Iran, a symbolic but pointed rebuke of Trump’s handling of the war.

On the ground, the conflict continued to smolder. An Iranian drone attack on Kuwait’s airport killed one person and suspended flights this week, and the US embassy in Jerusalem warned citizens that the “security environment can change quickly,” advising them to locate their nearest shelter.

The declaration of victory also came a day before CNN revealed the scope of what Iran absorbed during the war: a covert network of Israeli bases in Azerbaijan, Iraq, the UAE, and Somaliland that placed elite forces along three sides of Iran’s periphery and enabled sustained strikes deep inside the country.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

The chief executive of one of America’s largest telecommunications companies delivered one of the most direct warnings yet about how artificial intelligence could reshape the workforce. Speaking at the Bloomberg Tech Conference in San Francisco on Thursday, June 4, Verizon CEO Dan Schulman said he expects artificial intelligence to take over a significant portion of customer service work, potentially transforming one of the nation’s largest employment categories.

Unlike many corporate leaders who carefully avoid discussing job losses tied to AI, Schulman was unusually candid.

He said artificial intelligence will replace “a large percentage” of the work currently performed by customer service representatives as Verizon accelerates its efforts to modernize operations, improve efficiency, and reduce costs.

His comments offer a glimpse into how major corporations are planning for the next phase of AI adoption—not as an experimental tool, but as a core operational strategy capable of replacing tasks currently performed by millions of workers.

According to Schulman, the future of customer service will likely be divided into two categories.

Routine requests such as password resets, billing inquiries, account updates, and common troubleshooting questions will increasingly be handled entirely by AI systems.

More complex interactions, however, will continue to involve human employees working alongside artificial intelligence tools that provide information, recommendations, and support.

In that model, AI does not completely replace workers but significantly reduces the number of people required to handle customer interactions.

For Verizon, the financial logic is straightforward.

Customer service operations are among the most labor-intensive functions inside large corporations. Thousands of representatives handle millions of customer interactions every year, creating substantial payroll and training costs.

By automating routine requests, companies can lower expenses while potentially improving response times and availability.

Customers could receive assistance twenty-four hours a day without waiting on hold for a representative.

Schulman has repeatedly argued that artificial intelligence is not merely an efficiency tool but a critical part of Verizon’s long-term strategy.

Since becoming Verizon’s chief executive after succeeding Hans Vestberg, the former PayPal CEO has aggressively pursued cost reductions and operational restructuring.

In late 2025, Verizon eliminated approximately 13,000 positions, the largest workforce reduction in company history.

Additional reductions followed in 2026.

The company has publicly targeted approximately $5 billion in operating-expense savings, a goal that Verizon executives say will be achieved in large part through automation and artificial intelligence initiatives.

Chief Financial Officer Tony Skiadas has confirmed the savings target, while Schulman has stated that most of Verizon’s AI infrastructure should be operational by midyear, with full deployment expected by November.

The comments are significant because customer service remains one of the most common occupations in the United States.

Millions of Americans work in call centers, customer support departments, help desks, technical support operations, and related service functions.

Many of these jobs do not require advanced degrees, making them an important source of employment for workers entering the labor force or transitioning between careers.

If AI begins replacing a substantial percentage of these positions, the impact could extend far beyond Verizon itself.

The discussion reflects a broader debate taking place across Corporate America.

Supporters of AI argue that automation will improve productivity, reduce costs, and free workers from repetitive tasks so they can focus on higher-value activities.

Critics worry that the speed of adoption may outpace the economy’s ability to create replacement jobs.

Executives at companies including Amazon, Microsoft, and Google have acknowledged that AI will eliminate some positions while creating new opportunities elsewhere.

Schulman has taken a more direct stance.

He has repeatedly warned that significant workforce disruption is likely and has urged business leaders to be transparent with employees about what is coming.

His position differs from many CEOs who emphasize AI’s benefits while avoiding discussion of potential job reductions.

The customer-service industry may be one of the clearest examples of where automation can be implemented quickly.

Most customer interactions follow predictable patterns and involve repetitive questions that modern AI systems can answer with increasing accuracy.

Advances in large language models have dramatically improved AI’s ability to understand natural language, maintain conversations, and resolve routine issues without human intervention.

Verizon has reportedly been deploying AI-powered customer support tools for more than a year, giving the company firsthand experience with the technology’s capabilities.

For consumers, the transition presents both advantages and concerns.

On the positive side, AI-powered support can operate around the clock, eliminate long wait times, and provide immediate responses for common issues.

Many customers may welcome faster service for routine requests.

However, anyone who has struggled with automated phone systems or chatbots understands the potential frustrations.

Complex problems often require human judgment, empathy, and flexibility that machines still struggle to provide consistently.

Finding the right balance between automation and human support will likely determine whether customers embrace or resist the shift.

Verizon has attempted to address some workforce concerns by establishing programs designed to support retraining and career transitions for affected employees.

Still, the scale of potential disruption remains significant.

The broader significance of Schulman’s comments extends beyond one company.

They illustrate how quickly AI is moving from theory to implementation.

The debate is no longer about whether artificial intelligence can perform customer-service functions. Companies are increasingly deciding how much of their workforce they want the technology to replace.

Whether Verizon’s vision becomes the model for Corporate America remains to be seen.

But one thing is becoming increasingly clear: artificial intelligence is no longer a future workplace technology.

It is a present-day business strategy, and its impact on jobs is already beginning to reshape the labor market.

JBizNews Desk — Technology

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

A new CNN report is pulling back the curtain on one of the most sensitive parts of Israel’s war against Iran, a covert regional network that allegedly placed Israeli elite forces, Mossad personnel and rescue units around Iran’s borders, including inside Azerbaijan, just miles from Iranian territory.

BAKU, AZERBAIJAN – JANUARY 26: Azerbaijani Foreign Minister Jeyhun Bayramov and Israeli Foreign Minister Gideon Saar hold a joint press conference after their meeting in Baku, Azerbaijan on January 26, 2026. (Photo by Resul Rehimov/Anadolu via Getty Images)

According to CNN, Israel secretly deployed military and intelligence units to several locations in southern Azerbaijan during the war, near Iran’s northern border and roughly 60 miles from Tabriz, a major Iranian city later struck by Israel. The reported force included special operations troops, Mossad operatives and Israel’s elite heliborne combat-and-rescue personnel. What began as a possible emergency rescue footprint for downed Israeli pilots reportedly expanded into intelligence-gathering, drone operations and a forward perch for watching northern Iran.

Azerbaijan shares a long border with Iran, has deep security and energy ties with Israel, and sits beside a sensitive Iranian region with a large ethnic Azerbaijani population. For years, Tehran has feared that Baku’s relationship with Jerusalem could give Israel access to Iran’s northern flank. CNN’s report, if accurate, suggests that fear was not theoretical.

One of the most explosive claims is that Israeli preparations began before the war’s opening strikes, with surveillance equipment and intelligence assets reportedly placed near the Azerbaijan-Iran border. CNN says Israel initially planned some of the operation to coincide with earlier strikes that were later called off by President Trump, but Israel moved ahead with parts of the covert mission anyway as it assessed that diplomacy with Tehran was unlikely to hold.

The report also links the Azerbaijani front to the killing of Rahman Moghaddam, a senior IRGC intelligence figure Israel accused of running overseas operations and helping plan a 2024 assassination attempt against Trump. A day after Moghaddam was killed, drones struck Azerbaijan’s Nakhchivan exclave, damaging airport infrastructure and wounding civilians. Azerbaijani President Ilham Aliyev blamed Iran and called it an act of terror. Tehran denied responsibility.

That was not the only Iranian-linked threat tied to Azerbaijan. Days later, Azerbaijani authorities said they had foiled an IRGC plot targeting the Baku-Tbilisi-Ceyhan oil pipeline, the Israeli embassy in Baku, an Ashkenazi synagogue and a leader of the Mountain Jewish community. Israel later publicly said the Mossad, IDF and Shin Bet had helped expose a wider IRGC terror network aimed at Israeli, Jewish and Western targets abroad.

CNN’s report says Azerbaijan was only one piece of a larger Israeli regional architecture. The network allegedly included secret facilities in Iraq for logistics and possible search-and-rescue missions, Israeli air-defense deployments in the United Arab Emirates, and a position in Somaliland that could support long-range flights toward Iran. Taken together, the reported sites placed Israel around Iran’s northern, western and southern approaches, extending reach and sustaining pressure far beyond what airpower from Israel alone could provide.

Azerbaijan is fiercely denying the claim. Its Foreign Ministry called the CNN report “entirely baseless,” said Baku had repeatedly rejected the allegations before publication, and demanded CNN issue a retraction. Azerbaijan insists it has never allowed its territory to be used for military or intelligence operations against another state.

Israel has not publicly confirmed the reported deployments. But the picture emerging from CNN and regional reporting is clear, Israel’s campaign against Iran was not just a series of strikes. It was a carefully built regional machine designed to surround the Islamic Republic, reach deep into its territory, rescue pilots if needed, hunt IRGC operatives, and disrupt the terror networks Tehran uses far from home.

For Iran, the message is brutal. Its proxies are being hit across the region, its officers are being hunted, and its own neighborhood may no longer be safe ground.

BROOKLYN, N.Y. (VINnews) — New York City homeowners will not face fines for failing to comply with the city’s new trash bin requirement until at least September, following concerns about widespread shortages of the mandated containers.

Councilman Simcha Felder said the Department of Sanitation has agreed to issue warnings rather than summonses through Sept. 7 for owners of one-to-nine-unit residential properties who have not yet obtained the city’s official trash bins. The city also extended the deadline for residents to apply for reimbursement for bin purchases until the same date.

The decision came after Felder and a bipartisan group of 22 City Council members urged Mayor Eric Adams’ administration to delay enforcement, arguing that many residents have been unable to obtain the required bins despite months of trying.

“New Yorkers are understandably frustrated after spending months trying to purchase these bins, only to encounter limited availability, delays, and dead ends,” Felder said. He praised Sanitation Commissioner Gregory Anderson for recognizing that residents should not be penalized for failing to purchase bins that remain difficult to obtain.

According to Felder, homeowners have reported challenges locating the bins through retailers and delivery services, problems that were compounded after the original manufacturer left the New York market last year.

The city’s bin requirement currently applies only to household trash and does not extend to recycling or compost collection, a distinction that some residents have found confusing.

Supporters of the delay note that residents have already been required to place trash in containers with secure lids since November 2024, a measure intended to help reduce rodent activity and keep garbage contained.

Felder said the city should focus on helping residents comply rather than imposing penalties while supply issues persist. He also said he would seek another extension if shortages have not been resolved by the September deadline.

The request for a moratorium was backed by more than 20 council members from across the city, reflecting bipartisan concern over the rollout of the new requirement.

(JNS) – The Israeli Tourism Ministry launched a multi-platform campaign this week titled “I AM ISRAEL,” aimed at reconnecting U.S. citizens with the Jewish state, the ministry said on Thursday.

After three years of war that devastated Israel’s tourism sector, the campaign, totaling 20 million shekels (~$6.9 million), is prioritizing outreach to its largest source market.

Some 400,000 American tourists visited Israel in 2025, accounting for roughly one-third of all arrivals, according to the ministry.

The campaign tells Israel’s story through the people who live there—their everyday lives, culture, cuisine and authentic experiences—featuring three video series tailored to distinct American audiences: general leisure travelers, the Jewish market, and the Christian market.

The initiative will include video promotion, content collaborations with media outlets, influencer activity on social media, and PR events, the ministry said.

It will run across major digital platforms, including Hulu, Disney+, YouTube, Meta, iHeartRadio and leading content and lifestyle websites throughout North America. The series includes three videos and more than 30 short videos for social media.

Before the coronavirus pandemic, close to one million Americans arrived in Israel annually, a record that was broken in 2023 before the start of the war with more than one million arrivals.

“At a time when Israel is seen in the world primarily through the lens of the news, it is important to launch a campaign that presents a different reality, of life, of people, of culture and of connection,” the ministry cited its Director-General Michael Izhakov as saying.

“The campaign creates a personal and emotional connection, a powerful force for bringing tourism back to Israel. The tourism industry is a significant economic engine, and every tourist who comes to Israel becomes an ambassador for Israel,” he continued.

The Ukrainian president, writing his first letter to his Russian counterpart since Moscow launched its full-scale invasion, aims to unfreeze peace talks.

President Donald Trump offered a strong endorsement of Sen. Lindsey Graham’s reelection campaign on Thursday, praising the South Carolina Republican’s leadership on the Save America Act and calling on GOP voters to support him in the upcoming primary election.

In a Truth Social post, Trump thanked Graham for bringing the legislation to a vote and highlighted several of its key provisions while making clear that he wants Republican voters to rally behind the longtime senator.

“I’d like to thank our GREAT Senator, Lindsey Graham, for putting up THE SAVE AMERICA ACT for a Vote today,” Trump wrote, highlighting five key provisions.

Trump specifically applauded the bill’s election-related requirements, emphasizing that under the proposal, “ALL VOTERS MUST SHOW PHOTO I.D. (IDENTIFICATION!)” and that “ALL VOTERS MUST SHOW PROOF OF CITIZENSHIP.”

The legislation would also tighten restrictions on mail-in voting by limiting absentee ballots to circumstances involving “ILLNESS, DISABILITY, MILITARY, OR TRAVEL.”

In addition to election reforms, Trump noted that the measure would bar biological males from competing in women’s sports and would prohibit “TRANSGENDER MUTILIZATION SURGERY FOR OUR CHILDREN.”

The endorsement serves as the latest sign of the close political partnership between Trump and Graham, who has emerged as one of the president’s most reliable allies on Capitol Hill.

Over the years, Graham has consistently aligned himself with Trump on a wide range of issues, including judicial appointments, foreign policy matters, and election-related legislation.

Trump left no doubt about where he stands in South Carolina’s Republican primary, issuing a direct appeal to voters ahead of Tuesday’s contest.

“This Tuesday, June 9th, all Republicans in South Carolina should vote for Lindsey Graham,” Trump declared.

He further praised the senator, stating that Graham “HAS MY COMPLETE AND TOTAL ENDORSEMENT, AND WILL NOT LET YOU DOWN!”

Trump’s backing continues to be viewed as one of the most influential forces in Republican politics. His endorsements have enjoyed an exceptionally high success rate in recent election cycles, and his recent opposition to Rep. Thomas Massie’s reelection bid contributed to the Kentucky congressman’s defeat.

{Matzav.com}

A Bavarian hotel is facing a criminal investigation and has been removed from Booking.com after an Israeli family attempting to reserve a room received a message stating, “Sorry, there are no Jews allowed in our hotel.”

The family received the message on June 2 from Hotel Zum Hirschen, a 120-year-old family establishment in the Bavarian town of Lam, on the border with the Czech Republic, after attempting to book through Booking.com.

Following the message, the family filed a complaint with Booking.com and contacted Israel’s consulate general in Munich. They also lodged a complaint with the Bavarian Justice Ministry’s office for combating antisemitism, German outlet Die Welt reported. The Upper Palatinate Police Headquarters said the Regensburg Criminal Police have opened an investigation, and Booking.com removed the hotel from its platform.

The hotel initially denied sending the message, but later acknowledged that one of its employees had sent it, according to the Israeli consulate.

The hotel has since apologized, claiming the rejection was a mistake. It said it has been dealing for some time with fraudulent bookings and phishing attempts through Booking.com, and falsely assumed the booking request from Israel was one of these. In a statement on its website, the hotel said it “would like to make it unequivocally clear that we condemn all forms of discrimination,” adding that “the claim that certain groups are not welcome here is incorrect and does not reflect the facts.”

According to German journalist Tobias Huch, the hotel contacted the family directly, apologized, and provided evidence of previous phishing incidents.

The explanation did little to quiet the outrage. “Are we back in the 1930s?” said Talya Lador, Israel’s consul general to Southern Germany. “Antisemitism is not a Jewish problem. It is not an Israeli problem. It is a danger to democracy in Germany.”

Israel’s ambassador to Germany, Ron Prosor, told N12 News that “something must be done. When they write ‘No entry for Jews’ they are no longer hiding.”

Charlotte Knobloch, president of the Jewish Community of Munich and Upper Bavaria, said the motivation behind the message was ultimately beside the point. “In the end, it is almost secondary whether the author sent it out of hateful intent or simple thoughtlessness, because either way it describes the reality of many Jewish people, not only Israelis,” she said.

Josef Schuster, president of the Central Council of Jews in Germany, also condemned the message while acknowledging the hotel’s apology.

The incident follows other recent cases of hostility toward Israeli travelers. In late May, a California hotel worker asked an Israeli couple, “Are you a baby killer?” and cheered “Free Palestine” as they exited the lobby, according to viral videos of the confrontation.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

Check it out: New Shiurim directory for the Lakewood area allows you to search Daf Yomi Shiurim by time, area, Magid Shiur and more! https://thechabura.org/join

The list will now be updated in real time, vs a PDF – which was compiled in conjunction with TLS.

President Donald Trump announced Thursday that his administration is considering the creation of a new pedestrian promenade connecting the Lincoln Memorial to the Potomac River, a project that could ultimately bear his name and become one of the most visible additions to Washington’s landscape.

Speaking with reporters in the Oval Office, Trump revealed the proposal for the first time, explaining that the new walkway would extend from the iconic memorial honoring President Abraham Lincoln down to the riverfront.

“They want to call it the Trump Promenade,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office as he unveiled the project for the first time. “I don’t know if I want to do that, but it’s going to be beautiful.”

The announcement came as workers completed another major project championed by Trump: the refurbishment of the Reflecting Pool on the National Mall near the Lincoln Memorial. Water was being pumped back into the pool on Thursday as the renovation neared completion.

For the second consecutive day, Trump also highlighted a chart titled “Our Pool is Bigger than Skyscrapers,” which compares the dimensions of the Reflecting Pool to several well-known skyscrapers.

Since returning to office last year, Trump has launched an extensive effort to reshape and renovate prominent landmarks across the nation’s capital. The initiatives include upgrades to monuments, plans to replace the White House East Wing with a new ballroom, and the proposed construction of a massive triumphal arch.

The president has also sought to leave a more personal imprint on Washington, including efforts to associate his name with several cultural and civic institutions, among them the Kennedy Center for the Performing Arts.

Among his various projects, however, the proposal involving the Lincoln Memorial may prove the most consequential. The idea would not only alter access to one of America’s most revered monuments but could also attach Trump’s name to a section of the site.

Trump said the plan would restore an element of the memorial’s original design. According to him, the 1911 vision for the monument envisioned a direct connection between the memorial and the Potomac River, but the area was later divided by major roadways.

“It’s going to take the Lincoln Memorial right down to the Potomac, which it was always scheduled to do,” Trump said.

“We have a way of beautifully going over those two roads, the highways.”

Despite the administration’s ambitions, several of Trump’s high-profile projects have encountered resistance, and time is becoming an increasingly significant factor as his second and final term enters its latter half.

The Reflecting Pool renovation, which temporarily closed one of Washington’s most visited attractions, has drawn criticism over both its price tag and the manner in which the contract was awarded.

In another setback, a federal judge ruled last month that Trump’s name must be removed from the Kennedy Center.

Following that ruling, the Kennedy Center’s legal team reportedly instructed employees to eliminate references to Trump’s name from signage, printed materials, the organization’s website, and other official communications.

Trump’s planned White House ballroom has also faced obstacles. While the president has repeatedly stated that the project’s estimated $400 million cost will be covered by private donors and his own contributions, Republicans recently abandoned a separate proposal that would have allocated up to $1 billion for Secret Service security enhancements tied to the ballroom project, including a planned rooftop “drone pad.”

Iran’s oil exports have fallen to their lowest level in six years, highlighting the growing economic pressure facing Tehran as war, sanctions, and heightened geopolitical risk continue to reshape global energy markets.

According to shipping and trade data reported by Reuters on Thursday, June 4, Iranian crude exports declined in May to approximately 260,000 barrels per day, a dramatic fall from the country’s recent production levels and one of the clearest signs yet of the conflict’s impact on Iran’s economy.

The figure represents only a fraction of Iran’s 2025 average exports of approximately 1.67 million barrels per day, illustrating just how sharply the country’s oil trade has deteriorated.

For Iran, the decline carries enormous financial consequences.

Oil revenue remains one of the government’s most important sources of income. The loss of more than a million barrels per day in exports represents billions of dollars in lost revenue and places additional strain on an economy already facing significant sanctions and international restrictions.

The collapse has been driven by a combination of factors.

The ongoing U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran, which began in late February, has dramatically increased risks associated with transporting Iranian crude. Shipping companies face higher insurance costs, tanker operators face greater uncertainty, and many intermediaries have chosen to avoid Iranian cargo altogether.

The result has been a sharp reduction in the number of buyers willing to purchase Iranian oil and a significant increase in the discounts required to attract those who remain.

According to Reuters, Iranian Light crude was recently offered at discounts ranging between 50 cents and $1 per barrel below ICE Brent prices for June delivery into China. Only a short time ago, Iranian crude often commanded stronger pricing due to demand from refiners seeking discounted alternatives to other international supplies.

China remains Iran’s largest customer, particularly among independent refiners often referred to as “teapot refiners.” However, even these buyers are reportedly demanding larger discounts to compensate for the growing political and financial risks associated with purchasing Iranian oil.

The implications extend well beyond Iran.

Ordinarily, the removal of a major oil producer from international markets would support higher prices by reducing available supply. Yet markets are simultaneously being influenced by hopes of regional de-escalation following the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire announcement.

That has created competing forces within oil markets.

On one hand, Iran’s shrinking exports reduce global supply and support higher prices. On the other hand, growing optimism about diplomacy reduces the geopolitical premium that has been built into oil prices for months.

The result is a market struggling to determine which force will ultimately prove stronger.

For competing producers, Iran’s challenges present opportunities.

Countries throughout the Gulf region, along with other major exporters, may be able to capture market share previously supplied by Iranian crude. Producers capable of increasing exports stand to benefit from both higher volumes and potentially stronger pricing if Iranian supplies remain constrained.

Meanwhile, refiners that once relied on Iranian barrels must secure replacement supplies elsewhere, often at higher costs. Those additional expenses can eventually work their way through supply chains and impact consumers around the world.

The disruption is especially significant in Asia, where many refiners built purchasing strategies around discounted Iranian crude. As those supplies become less available, companies must adjust procurement strategies, renegotiate contracts, and absorb higher operating costs.

The decline to 260,000 barrels per day marks a remarkable transformation.

Only a year ago, Iran remained a significant force in global energy markets. Today, it has been reduced to a marginal exporter compared with its recent production levels.

The development demonstrates how effectively sanctions, military conflict, and market pressure can combine to restrict a country’s ability to participate in global trade.

The key question for energy markets is what happens next.

A diplomatic breakthrough involving Iran could eventually allow exports to recover, bringing substantial additional supply back into the global market. Such a development would likely place downward pressure on oil prices and reshape competitive dynamics across the energy sector.

That possibility explains why traders continue to monitor diplomatic discussions between Washington and Tehran so closely.

For now, however, Iran’s oil industry remains under intense pressure.

Exports remain near six-year lows, government revenues remain constrained, and the country’s ability to finance operations has been significantly weakened. In an energy market already navigating war, sanctions, and geopolitical uncertainty, the near-disappearance of one of the world’s major producers remains one of the most important stories shaping global oil markets today.

JBizNews Desk — Middle East

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

President Donald Trump said Thursday that the United States does not need an agreement with Iran to retrieve the country’s enriched uranium stockpile, and that he has no desire to meet with Iranian Supreme Leader Mojtaba Khamenei.

“We could get it right now. I don’t think they could stop us if we wanted, but there’s no reason to. It’s entombed,” Trump told reporters in the Oval Office.

The remarks come as negotiations between Washington and Tehran remain unresolved, and they raised new questions because the proposed deal centers heavily on the future of Iran’s uranium stockpile.

Trump said the buried material is under constant American watch. “It’s being photographed from every angle. We can get it out now. If anyone gets close to it, we will know what to do,” he said.

He also revealed that a military retrieval operation was considered early in the war. “There was a time at the beginning when we thought about doing it,” he said, estimating that a mission to forcibly remove the uranium would take at least two weeks. “Getting there is not like Venezuela. You have to be there for two weeks. You need a lot of equipment.”

Trump indicated he declined the operation because of the risks. “I didn’t feel like being like Jimmy Carter,” he said, alluding to the failed 1980 mission to rescue American hostages in Iran.

On the prospect of meeting Khamenei, Trump said he did not want to, but added that if Washington and Tehran reached a deal, it was possible the two would meet: “If it happened … I’d be respectful.” “In some circles he has a very good reputation actually,” Trump said of the Iranian leader.

The comments mark another apparent softening in Trump’s posture. He recently backed away from his previous demand for an end to all Iranian enrichment, saying on May 15 that he would accept a 20-year suspension of uranium enrichment. On Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal reported, citing several U.S. officials, that Trump told aides he will only end the ceasefire with Iran if Tehran kills American troops.

Trump also told reporters he believed progress was being made between Israel and Lebanon, saying Lebanon deserved to have peace.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

President Donald Trump joked Thursday that Hunter Biden could potentially make a run for the White House in 2028, arguing that if other politically embattled candidates are managing to remain viable, the former first son might have a chance as well.

The comments came after Fox News correspondent Peter Doocy asked Trump about speculation surrounding Hunter Biden’s political future.

“[Hunter Biden’s] on social media now, and he has suggested – maybe joking, I don’t know – that he could run for president in 2028. How would he do, Hunter Biden, in a 2028 Democratic primary?” Fox News’ Peter Doocy asked Trump on Thursday.

The question followed Hunter Biden’s recent activity on X, where he launched an account in May, prompting discussion about whether he may be considering a future role in politics.

“I would say his past is not the greatest,” Trump responded.

The president then compared Hunter Biden’s prospects to those of a Democratic Senate candidate in Maine who has faced a series of controversies during his campaign.

“Hey, if the guy from Maine can do well,” the president continued. “Well, I guess Hunter could do well, too, because the guy from Maine is a basket case.”

Trump was referring to Maine Senate candidate Graham Platner, whose campaign has been dogged by reports involving a deleted Reddit account, a tattoo linked to Nazi imagery, allegations of hard-drug use, and more. Hunter Biden, meanwhile, has long faced scrutiny over his struggles with addiction and legal issues, culminating in a broad pardon issued by his father shortly before Trump returned to the White House.

Despite the controversies surrounding his campaign, Platner has remained competitive in polling as he seeks to defeat Republican Sen. Susan Collins.

Trump also drew a comparison between a hypothetical Hunter Biden presidential campaign and Texas Democratic Senate nominee James Talarico.

“And I would say worse than him is the one from Texas that looks like Alfred E. Neuman,” he said “I would say that if he can do well, maybe Hunter can do well. I’m not sure, it’ll be pretty close as far as I’m concerned.”

The president made the remarks while speaking with reporters during an event highlighting the administration’s investments in the coal industry. During the exchange, he was also asked about former President Joe Biden’s condition during a private Oval Office meeting held shortly after the 2024 election.

“President Biden is out promoting a new book this week. When you met with Joe Biden, President Joe Biden, right here in the Oval Office on November the 13th of 2024, could you detect any cognitive decline in President Biden at that time?” a reporter asked.

Trump said he did not notice any significant difference in Biden during that meeting.

“No, not really. I mean, he was the same guy I’ve been watching for a long time,” the president answered.

“He was fine as far as I was concerned,” Trump said, adding that “I don’t know, something happened to him during the debate. It could have been me.”

At the same time, Trump suggested that Biden had never been known as a particularly sharp political figure, remarking that the former president was “never the sharpest guy.”

{Matzav.com}

Canadian Prime Minister Mark Carney is facing criticism after his government’s new advisory council on antisemitism was revealed to include a former minister who once objected to labeling the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades a terrorist group and a lawyer who represented anti-Israel encampment activists.

Speaking in Toronto, Carney acknowledged that “Canada’s civic compact is failing Jewish Canadians” as he unveiled the Ministerial Advisory Council on Rights, Equality, and Inclusion. He called antisemitism a scourge and tasked the group with an initial mandate to examine the drivers of anti-Jewish hatred. The announcement noted that Jewish Canadians, roughly 1 percent of the population, were targeted in more than two-thirds of religion-motivated hate crimes last year.

But the membership quickly drew fire. Among the appointees is Omar Alghabra, a former transport minister and former president of the Canadian Arab Federation. In a 2004 press release, Alghabra’s organization chided CanWest publications for inserting the word “terrorists” into wire stories describing Middle Eastern groups, citing a National Post story that called the al-Aqsa Martyrs Brigades a terrorist group. The federation rejected the terror labeling after Ottawa had already listed the group, and had earlier opposed Canada’s designation of Hamas and Palestinian Islamic Jihad as terrorist entities.

Alghabra also told the Jewish Tribune in a 2006 interview that he “didn’t believe that Hamas wants the elimination of Israel,” despite it stating so in the very first paragraph of the terrorist group’s charter.

Also named was litigator Avnish Nanda, who represented pro-Palestinian campus activists in a lawsuit against the University of Alberta in 2024 after the university called in police to clear an encampment it said raised public safety concerns.

The council’s other members include former senator Marc Gold, LGBT activist Martine Roy, retired Olympic skater Catriona Le May Doan, Metis advocate Gary LaPlante, and academic Aftab Erfan. Gold previously chaired the Jewish Federations of Canada, and critics noted he is the council’s only Jewish member. The body, chaired by Culture Minister Marc Miller, replaced the special envoy positions on antisemitism and Islamophobia that the government eliminated in February.

Conservative Leader Pierre Poilievre blasted the appointments. “I’m not sure he’s the right guy to combat antisemitism,” he said of Alghabra, accusing him of previously lobbying to keep Hezbollah legal before entering politics. “The last thing we need is another council. This is the problem with Mark Carney. Every time there’s a problem, he creates a new bureaucracy, agency, council, that does nothing except pay high per diems and expenses to a bunch of Liberal insiders.”

Critics in the Jewish community argued the council lacks expertise on antisemitism. Law professor Michael Geist wrote that the body has been asked to approach antisemitism with more study and data collection, “but we are long past the time when the community needs more study.”

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

SpaceX, the rocket and satellite company founded by Elon Musk, has officially set the price for what could become the largest initial public offering in history, according to a prospectus filed with the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission on Wednesday, June 3. The company priced shares at $135 each, valuing SpaceX at approximately $1.77 trillion and positioning the offering to shatter virtually every previous IPO record.

If completed as planned, the offering would raise as much as $75 billion, dwarfing the previous record held by Alibaba, whose 2014 public debut raised approximately $22 billion.

The shares are expected to begin trading on the Nasdaq during the week of June 12 under the ticker symbol SPCX, immediately making SpaceX one of the most valuable publicly traded companies on the planet.

The numbers are staggering.

At the IPO price, SpaceX would debut with a valuation greater than many of the world’s largest corporations and would instantly rank among the most valuable technology companies ever listed on a public exchange.

Yet the most unusual aspect of the offering may not be its size.

It may be who gets access.

Traditionally, large institutional investors receive the majority of IPO allocations at the offering price, while ordinary investors often must wait until shares begin trading publicly—frequently at significantly higher prices.

SpaceX is taking a different approach.

The company has announced that retail investors will be permitted to request shares at the same IPO price offered to major institutions through participating brokerage platforms including Robinhood, Fidelity, Charles Schwab, SoFi, and Morgan Stanley’s E*TRADE.

For many investors, it represents a rare opportunity to participate in one of the world’s most closely watched private companies before trading begins on the open market.

However, there are important limitations.

Demand is expected to vastly exceed available supply.

Investors may receive only a portion of the shares they request—or none at all.

Certain platforms have additional restrictions. Charles Schwab, for example, requires eligible clients to maintain account balances of at least $100,000 to participate in IPO allocations.

The company’s investor roadshow officially began on Thursday, June 4, as executives and underwriters started presenting the investment case to institutional investors around the world.

The offering also cements Elon Musk’s control over the company.

According to the SEC filing, SpaceX will maintain a dual-class share structure, allowing Musk to retain approximately 82.4% of voting power after the IPO despite selling shares to the public.

The structure mirrors arrangements used by other founder-led technology companies, where voting control remains concentrated even after public ownership expands.

If SpaceX successfully debuts at its proposed valuation and trading remains strong, Musk’s personal wealth could exceed $1 trillion, potentially making him the first individual in history to reach trillionaire status.

Yet not everyone believes the valuation is justified.

Research firm Morningstar recently estimated SpaceX’s fair value at approximately $780 billion, less than half the proposed IPO valuation.

Morningstar analysts argued that investors should be cautious and suggested that more attractive entry points could emerge after the initial excitement surrounding the offering fades.

Their concern centers largely on profitability.

While Starlink, SpaceX’s satellite internet business, has become a major revenue generator and one of the company’s most profitable operations, other segments continue consuming enormous amounts of capital.

The company’s launch business requires ongoing investment, while its artificial intelligence initiatives are reportedly expected to lose billions of dollars as development continues.

Morningstar estimates SpaceX’s AI division alone could burn through approximately $10 billion during 2026.

Investor concerns have extended beyond Wall Street research firms.

The American Federation of Teachers, representing approximately 1.8 million members, wrote to SEC Chairman Paul Atkins earlier this year requesting heightened scrutiny of the offering.

The union expressed concern that retirement funds and everyday investors could be exposed to what it described as a highly speculative and potentially overvalued investment.

Those concerns reflect a broader debate surrounding the IPO.

Supporters argue that SpaceX has transformed multiple industries, from commercial space launches to satellite communications, and possesses growth opportunities that justify an extraordinary valuation.

Critics counter that even exceptional businesses can become poor investments if purchased at excessive prices.

For everyday investors, the decision presents both opportunity and risk.

On one hand, participation offers access to one of the most influential private companies ever created, alongside major institutional investors paying the same IPO price.

On the other hand, the company would begin trading at a valuation that some respected analysts believe is more than double its intrinsic value.

There is also the possibility of a significant first-day trading surge.

Because retail demand is expected to overwhelm available shares, many investors will likely receive only partial allocations. That scarcity could create a buying frenzy when trading begins, potentially pushing shares well above the offering price.

Such surges are common among highly anticipated IPOs, but they can also leave late buyers purchasing shares at inflated valuations.

The SpaceX offering represents more than just another stock market debut.

It is a test of investor appetite for ambitious growth stories, a referendum on Elon Musk’s vision, and perhaps the most significant public-market event of the year.

Whether the IPO ultimately becomes a legendary investment success or a cautionary tale about valuation remains unknown.

What is certain is that when SpaceX begins trading, Wall Street—and millions of ordinary investors—will be watching.

JBizNews Desk — Markets

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

President Donald Trump said Thursday that Iran’s underground nuclear facilities were devastated by recent strikes and argued that only the United States and China possess the specialized equipment necessary to reach any enriched uranium that may remain buried beneath the damaged sites.

Speaking to reporters in the Oval Office, Trump insisted the attacks had completely destroyed the targeted facilities.

“We attacked their nuclear sites and they were obliterated,” he told reporters in the Oval Office.

Trump also took aim at media reports that questioned the extent of the damage, specifically referencing coverage by CNN.

“It turned out that, you know, CNN was wrong. They said, ‘Well, maybe they weren’t hit that hard.’ They were hit so hard, nobody knows if you could even get it out,” he added.

The president maintained that even if enriched uranium remains beneath the sites, recovering it would be an enormous challenge and could only be attempted by a handful of countries.

“But the only ones that have the capability of getting it out are us and China,” Trump said.

According to Trump, the depth of the facilities and the scale of the destruction would require highly specialized machinery capable of penetrating deep into mountainous terrain.

“We’re the only ones with that kind of equipment that’s powerful enough to go down that deep into a mountain, but that mountain crushed it.”

He further emphasized the extent of the damage, saying the strikes caused a collapse that buried the facilities beneath the mountain itself.

“That mountain literally collapsed on top of it.”

Trump also cited assessments from the International Atomic Energy Agency, saying the organization’s findings support his view that access to the sites would be extremely difficult.

“And now the atomic energy, as you know, has backed us up on that. They think it’s a very, very hard thing to get to, but we’ll get it anyway. But we’re the only ones — and China, I believe, does, too — that have the capability,” he said.

{Matzav.com}

CrowdStrike Holdings Inc., one of the world’s largest cybersecurity companies, delivered another quarter of strong revenue growth, rising profits, and expanding demand for its artificial intelligence-powered security products. Yet despite beating Wall Street expectations and announcing a four-for-one stock split, investors responded by sending the stock sharply lower, highlighting the increasingly unforgiving standards facing technology companies at the center of the AI boom.

The company reported results after the close on Wednesday, June 3, with founder and Chief Executive Officer George Kurtz emphasizing CrowdStrike’s growing role as a critical security provider for businesses rapidly adopting artificial intelligence technologies.

The numbers appeared impressive by almost every traditional measure.

For the quarter ended April 30, CrowdStrike reported revenue of approximately $1.39 billion, representing a 26% increase from the same period a year earlier and exceeding analyst expectations of roughly $1.36 billion.

Adjusted earnings reached $1.10 per share, ahead of the approximately $1.07 per share analysts had forecast.

Perhaps most notably, CrowdStrike swung to a profit of approximately $27.8 million, compared with a loss of approximately $104.3 million during the same quarter last year.

The company also generated a record $468 million in free cash flow, an important measure of how much cash remains after operating expenses and capital investments.

For most companies, results like these would have been enough to trigger a significant rally.

Instead, CrowdStrike shares fell between 8% and 13% in after-hours trading and early Thursday trading, dropping toward $679 per share after closing Wednesday near $748.

Investors appeared focused on one metric that failed to meet elevated expectations.

The company reported billings of approximately $1.35 billion, an increase of 18% year-over-year but slightly below what many analysts had anticipated.

Billings are closely watched because they provide a forward-looking indicator of future revenue. Since customers typically sign contracts before the associated revenue is recognized, billings often serve as an early signal of future growth.

Although revenue, earnings, profitability, and guidance all improved, investors viewed the softer billings figure as a potential warning sign that future growth may not accelerate as quickly as expected.

Adding to shareholder interest was the company’s announcement of a four-for-one stock split.

Under the plan approved by CrowdStrike’s board of directors, shareholders of record as of June 25 will receive three additional shares for every one share they own. The additional shares will be distributed after the market closes on July 1, with split-adjusted trading beginning on July 2.

Stock splits do not change the overall value of a shareholder’s investment. Instead, they increase the number of shares outstanding while proportionally lowering the share price.

Companies often pursue stock splits after significant share-price appreciation, making shares appear more affordable and accessible to retail investors.

CrowdStrike’s stock had gained nearly 59% this year before earnings, making it one of the strongest performers in the cybersecurity sector.

During the earnings call, Kurtz repeatedly emphasized the connection between cybersecurity and artificial intelligence.

He described the current period as CrowdStrike’s “Mythos moment,” arguing that AI adoption across the corporate world is increasing demand for advanced security tools capable of protecting increasingly complex digital environments.

Kurtz compared CrowdStrike’s role to the suppliers of picks and shovels during a gold rush, arguing that regardless of which AI companies ultimately dominate, organizations will continue needing cybersecurity infrastructure to protect their systems and data.

The CEO attributed some of the weaker billings performance to timing issues rather than slowing demand.

According to Kurtz, several deals connected to a major platform launch in April took longer to close than initially expected. He stressed that the delays reflected customer purchasing cycles rather than deteriorating business conditions.

Management pointed to several AI-related initiatives designed to strengthen CrowdStrike’s competitive position.

Among them is Project QuiltWorks, a collaboration involving OpenAI and Anthropic, along with additional AI-powered threat detection and security products intended to help customers secure increasingly AI-driven operations.

Chief Financial Officer Burt Podbere cited strong customer retention rates, a record sales pipeline, and healthy demand as reasons the company increased portions of its full-year outlook.

Despite those reassurances, the market remained skeptical.

The selloff also spread beyond CrowdStrike itself.

Shares of rival cybersecurity provider Palo Alto Networks declined during Thursday trading despite having no company-specific news. Investors appeared to reassess valuations across the cybersecurity sector following CrowdStrike’s report.

The reaction mirrored what happened earlier in the week with Broadcom.

Both companies exceeded analyst expectations. Both companies increased portions of their outlooks. Both companies highlighted strong AI-related demand.

And yet both stocks suffered significant declines.

The common thread is investor expectations.

As artificial intelligence has become the dominant investment theme of 2026, shares of companies associated with AI infrastructure, cybersecurity, cloud computing, and semiconductors have climbed dramatically. The result is that investors increasingly demand not merely strong results, but extraordinary results that significantly exceed already ambitious expectations.

CrowdStrike’s quarter illustrates how difficult that environment has become.

The company generated strong revenue growth.

It returned to profitability.

It produced record cash flow.

It raised guidance.

It announced a stock split.

Yet a single metric that came in slightly below expectations became the focus of investor attention.

For businesses and consumers, however, the broader story remains largely positive.

The rapid growth of artificial intelligence is creating an equally rapid need for cybersecurity protection. Every company adopting AI tools must also secure the systems, networks, and data that power those technologies.

That demand is exactly where CrowdStrike operates.

The market may have been disappointed by one number, but the company’s results suggest that demand for cybersecurity remains strong and that AI adoption continues to create significant opportunities across the sector.

The lesson for investors may be the same one repeatedly emerging during this earnings season: in today’s AI-driven market, strong performance alone is not always enough. When expectations reach extreme levels, even exceptional results can trigger selling if they fail to exceed what investors had already imagined.

JBizNews Desk — Markets

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

WATCH:

Speaking at the opening of the toeiva parade held in Yerushalayim on Thursday, Former Israeli Prime Minister Yair Lapid pledged Thursday that the next government would pass legislation recognizing toeiva marriage within its first 100 days.

Lapid, a longtime antagonist of frum Israelis, told the crowd that under the next government, all couples would be “equal before the law,” explicitly including toeiva pairs. “If this government has a problem” with the toeiva community, he declared, “then this government should go home.”

The pledge is a direct assault on the institution of marriage in Eretz Yisroel, where personal status matters have been governed by halacha through the Rabbanut since the founding of the state. There is currently no civil marriage in Israel, and the status quo on these matters has been a red line for the chareidi parties in every coalition negotiation for decades.

An estimated 10,000 people participated in the parade, which this year deliberately routed past the Supreme Court and the Knesset, with organizers stating openly that their goal is legislative change. The event was held during an election season, and organizers acknowledged the timing was meant to pressure politicians.

The threat is compounded by Lapid’s new political partnership. In April, he and former Prime Minister Naftali Bennett launched a joint party, and Bennett has stated that a government under his leadership would advance both toeiva marriage and civil marriage. The pairing of Lapid, who built his career on attacking lomdei Torah and the chareidi tzibbur, with Bennett, who previously partnered with him in the government that targeted yeshiva budgets and drafted gezeiros against bnei Torah, signals that the religious status quo would be under immediate attack should they come to power.

(YWN World Headquarters – NYC)

Broadcom delivered one of the strongest quarters in corporate America this year, posting record revenue, explosive artificial intelligence growth, and better-than-expected earnings. Yet despite those results, investors sent the stock sharply lower, demonstrating just how demanding Wall Street has become toward companies at the center of the AI boom.

The company reported results after the market closed on Wednesday, June 3, with President and CEO Hock Tan describing demand for Broadcom’s AI products as “simply insatiable.” Nevertheless, investors focused less on what Broadcom achieved and more on what it did not do—raise already lofty expectations.

The result was a sharp selloff that erased hundreds of billions of dollars in market value and rattled the broader technology sector.

Broadcom reported record quarterly revenue of $22.2 billion, representing a remarkable 48% increase from the same period a year ago.

The company’s artificial intelligence business continued to be the primary growth engine. Revenue from AI semiconductors surged to $10.8 billion, up 143% year-over-year, exceeding the company’s own guidance and reinforcing Broadcom’s growing role as one of the most important infrastructure providers in the AI revolution.

Adjusted earnings reached $2.44 per share, slightly ahead of analyst expectations of approximately $2.40 per share, according to LSEG consensus estimates.

On the surface, the results appeared difficult to criticize.

Even more impressive was management’s forecast for the current quarter.

Broadcom projected third-quarter revenue of approximately $29.4 billion, representing annual growth of roughly 84%, while forecasting AI semiconductor revenue of approximately $16 billion, more than 200% higher than the prior year.

For most companies, numbers like those would spark a major rally.

Instead, Broadcom’s stock fell approximately 12% to 15% during Thursday trading after closing the previous session near a record $495 per share.

The reason highlights one of the defining characteristics of today’s AI-driven market.

Investors were not disappointed by what Broadcom reported. They were disappointed by what they hoped Broadcom would report.

Specifically, investors wanted management to increase its full-year artificial intelligence forecast. Instead, Tan reaffirmed the company’s existing target of approximately $56 billion in AI semiconductor revenue for fiscal 2026 while maintaining its long-term projection of more than $100 billion in AI-related revenue by fiscal 2027.

Those numbers remain enormous by any traditional standard.

But after months of relentless upward revisions throughout the AI sector, investors had become conditioned to expect another increase. When Broadcom simply maintained guidance rather than raising it, the market interpreted that as a sign that growth may eventually begin normalizing.

Additional comments during the earnings call added to investor concerns.

Tan acknowledged that Google, one of Broadcom’s largest custom-chip customers, is unlikely to rely exclusively on a single supplier and will probably continue using multiple vendors.

While not surprising from a business perspective, the comment reminded investors that Broadcom faces competition even among its largest clients.

Tan also highlighted another challenge emerging from Broadcom’s success.

The rapid expansion of AI semiconductor sales is creating pressure on overall profit margins because those products carry lower margins than some of the company’s software operations and mature semiconductor businesses.

In other words, Broadcom is selling far more AI chips, but the mix of revenue is shifting toward products that generate somewhat lower profitability.

That nuance matters to analysts attempting to determine how profitable the AI boom will ultimately become.

Broadcom occupies a unique position within the artificial intelligence ecosystem.

Unlike Nvidia, which dominates the market for general-purpose AI processors, Broadcom specializes in designing custom AI chips for a select group of major technology companies while also providing the networking infrastructure that allows massive AI data centers to function efficiently.

According to Tan, Broadcom currently works with six major custom-chip customers, including Google, Meta, OpenAI, and Anthropic.

The networking business alone accounted for nearly 40% of AI semiconductor revenue during the quarter, highlighting Broadcom’s growing importance in connecting the thousands of processors required to train and operate advanced AI systems.

The company’s software division also continued to perform well.

Revenue from infrastructure software, including the acquired VMware business, increased 9% to $7.2 billion, providing Broadcom with an additional source of recurring revenue beyond semiconductors.

The company also reaffirmed its quarterly dividend of $0.65 per share, payable on June 30 to shareholders of record as of June 22.

Despite the selloff, few analysts questioned the underlying strength of the business.

Instead, Broadcom’s decline became another example of how difficult it has become for AI leaders to satisfy investors.

The artificial intelligence boom has created enormous valuations across a small group of technology companies. As expectations rise, investors increasingly demand not just excellent results, but results that significantly exceed already elevated forecasts.

Broadcom’s quarter perfectly illustrates that dynamic.

The company generated record revenue.

It more than doubled AI sales.

It beat earnings estimates.

It forecast massive future growth.

Yet the stock still declined sharply because Wall Street had already priced in something even better.

The impact extended beyond Broadcom itself.

Shares of other AI and semiconductor companies moved lower following the report, helping create a more cautious tone across the Nasdaq and reminding investors that sentiment can change quickly in sectors driven by extremely high expectations.

The broader lesson may be less about Broadcom specifically and more about the current state of the market.

Artificial intelligence remains one of the most powerful growth stories in the global economy. Demand continues expanding rapidly, data center spending remains robust, and companies like Broadcom continue generating extraordinary financial results.

But as valuations climb higher, merely excellent performance is no longer enough.

For investors accustomed to constant upside surprises, Broadcom delivered a reminder that sometimes meeting expectations—even exceptionally ambitious expectations—can still feel like a disappointment.

JBizNews Desk — Markets

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

LISTEN:

https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Bitachon4Life-Shiur-1788-Semichah-Part-88-Constant.mp3

​​For more info, email [email protected].

LISTEN:

https://matzav.com/wp-content/uploads/2026/06/Tefila4Life-Shiur-1092-Beauty-Vayevarech-Dovid.mp3

This post was originally published on this site.

Israeli Heritage Minister Amichai Eliyahu quietly traveled to Russia on Thursday for an official visit, marking the first trip by a member of Israel’s government to the country in three years. Arutz Sheva–Israel National News reports exclusively that Eliyahu is expected to remain in Russia through the weekend before returning to Israel on Sunday.

The visit comes against the backdrop of the ongoing Russia-Ukraine war and a sensitive diplomatic climate between Moscow and Israel, making the trip particularly notable.

While in Russia, Eliyahu conducted a series of working meetings with businessman Lev Leviev, as well as officials from the Israeli Embassy and leaders of the local Jewish community.

The discussions centered on plans for a new heritage center dedicated to immigrants from the former Soviet Union. The project, which is being developed in partnership with the Rishon LeZion Municipality, is expected to cost more than 100 million shekels and aims to preserve the legacy and experiences of Soviet Jewry for future generations.

“Since the 1990s, no one has been telling this story, and in another moment, it will be forgotten,” Minister Eliyahu told Arutz Sheva-Israel National News, explaining the necessity of the project.

Eliyahu said his commitment to the initiative stems from a formative experience during his youth. At age 12, he accompanied his father, Rabbi Shmuel Eliyahu, to witness the large-scale immigration of Jews from the former Soviet Union to Israel. Seeing his father moved to tears left a lasting impression on him, and over time he became increasingly aware of the cultural and historical challenges facing many Russian-speaking immigrants, inspiring him to champion the heritage center.

The trip is especially significant given the strained history between Eliyahu and Russian officials. Roughly a month after the outbreak of the Swords of Iron War, Russia’s Foreign Ministry publicly condemned remarks he made suggesting that the use of an atomic bomb in Gaza was an option.

At the time, Russian Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Maria Zakharova responded sharply, saying, “This appears to be an admission by Israel that it possesses nuclear weapons. If we are hearing official statements on this matter, then where are the inspectors of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA)?”

{Matzav.com}

This post was originally published on this site.

The government approved a budget of over one billion new shekels on Tuesday to carry out military tribunals for terrorists who participated in the October 7 Hamas massacre in 2023.

The legislation to prosecute terrorists involved in the October 7 massacre was passed in May, granting authority to impose the death penalty and conduct public trials for the perpetrators of the attacks at a Jerusalem military court. The law’s proposal consists of a broad framework for implementing the trials.

The Defense Ministry and the Finance Ministry stated that the framework of over a billion shekels was approved for the years 2026-2029, and that the funds will be allocated to the Defense Ministry and the IDF.

The approved budget is intended for establishing numerous buildings to implement the law, the Defense and Finance Ministries stated.

The infrastructure to be built for the trials includes a court complex, prosecution offices, and an IDF headquarters facility.

The allocated budget is also said to be used to cover the necessary manpower recruitment, salary costs, and the maintenance and upkeep of buildings.

The funds would further go toward computer and communications systems, broadcasting, catering, medical services, transportation, and other services, the ministries added.

Possible to advance preparations

The ministers stated that it was now possible to advance all necessary preparations to carry out the judicial proceedings, with government approval and budget allocation in place.

Though the legislation was already approved in the Knesset, the large sum of over a billion shekels to be directed to the initiative had reportedly been disputed by government ministries.

Defense Minister Israel Katz said after the approval that Israel will “ensure justice is served against the perpetrators of the most brutal massacre committed against the Jewish people since the Holocaust, and will send a clear and unequivocal message to all our enemies: whoever massacres, murders, rapes, and kidnaps Israeli civilians will pay the full price.”

Finance Minister Bezalel Smotrich added that the budget was being allocated “to advance this moral obligation and to ensure that all those who wish us harm know their fate and what awaits them.”

The legislation to prosecute the terrorists includes ensuring that key moments of the trial for the military courts would be filmed and broadcast on a dedicated website.

It establishes provisions concerning judicial panels, public access to proceedings, audiovisual documentation of hearings, and the broadcasting of parts of the proceedings to the public.

The law further proposes establishing specific arrangements for appointing judges to the court, including sitting and retired judges.

It calls for establishing special arrangements regarding victims’ rights, legal representation for defendants, and the conduct of hearings via video conference.

The legislation also proposes to create a special guard unit to secure the military court in Jerusalem.

It mandates administrative preparations for conducting the proceedings, periodic reporting to the Knesset, and the promulgation of regulations concerning the implementation of death sentences.

Trail video, audio to be preserved in State Archives

Additionally, the bill includes provisions to preserve video and audio documentation of the trials in the State Archives.

While a bill was passed in March to legislate the death penalty for terrorists in Israel, it could not be implemented retroactively, causing the military tribunals bill to be required to issue the death penalty to terrorists involved in the October 7 attacks.

Capital punishment has only been carried out twice in Israel’s history.

The last person to be executed by Israel was Nazi Holocaust architect Adolf Eichmann, who was hanged in 1962.

The legislation had been sponsored by both coalition and opposition MKs, and passed its final readings by a unanimous vote of 93 to 0.

Lawmakers who sponsored the bill likened it to the Eichmann trials in 1961, which broadcast live and recorded testimonies of Holocaust survivors throughout Israel and numerous other countries before Eichmann’s hanging took place.

During the October 7 massacre, Hamas terrorists brutally murdered over 1,200 people, mostly civilians, and kidnapped 251 hostages. The attacks also included sexual violence and rape.

This post was originally published on here.

A group of six Republican senators broke with their party and sided with Democrats in support of an amendment aimed at preventing construction of President Donald Trump’s planned 90,000-square-foot White House ballroom without explicit approval from Congress.

The proposal, introduced by Sen. Jeff Merkley (D-Ore.), sought to place authority for the ballroom project solely in the hands of Congress. It also would have prohibited the use of federal funds or private donations for the project unless lawmakers first signed off on it.

The six Republicans who voted with Democrats to overcome a procedural hurdle were Sens. Susan Collins of Maine, Jon Husted of Ohio, Jerry Moran of Kansas, Lisa Murkowski of Alaska, Dan Sullivan of Alaska, and Thom Tillis of North Carolina.

The amendment was offered during the Senate’s vote-a-rama on the Republican reconciliation package focused on immigration enforcement funding. To move forward, it needed 60 votes to defeat a point-of-order challenge.

The measure ultimately fell short, failing by a vote of 52-47.

Several of the Republicans who supported the amendment are facing difficult political battles ahead of the November elections.

A recent Fox News survey of 1,015 registered Ohio voters, conducted between May 28 and June 1, found Husted trailing former Democratic Sen. Sherrod Brown in Ohio’s Senate contest.

In Maine, a UMASS Lowell/YouGov poll of 650 likely voters conducted between May 13 and May 26 showed Democratic challenger Graham Platner ahead of Collins by a margin of 48 percent to 43 percent.

Meanwhile, an Alaska Survey Research poll conducted in March among 1,283 registered voters found Democratic candidate Mary Peltola leading Sullivan in a potential Senate matchup.

Earlier this week, Senate Republicans removed language from the revised reconciliation bill that would have provided up to $1 billion in federal funding for the ballroom project. The revised legislation was released by the Senate Judiciary Committee.

The original version of the budget package had included as much as $1 billion for security improvements at the White House and the proposed ballroom. That funding provision sparked significant resistance from Republican senators, prompting its removal from the final Senate draft.

{Matzav.com}

(VINnews) – New Haven police are searching for a man accused of targeting visibly Jewish pedestrians with anti-Semitic remarks and physical intimidation in downtown New Haven.

The incident occurred Tuesday at about 3:50 p.m. near the intersection of Crown and Temple streets, according to police.

Three men, including a New Haven resident in his 40s and a visitor from New Jersey in his 20s, told officers they were standing on a sidewalk when an unidentified man began shouting at them from roughly 20 feet away.

Police said the suspect appeared agitated and directed anti-Semitic comments toward the group, including telling them to “get out of my city” and “go back where you belong.” The victims were described as visibly identifiable members of the Jewish community.

As the confrontation escalated, the suspect allegedly moved closer while continuing to yell and appeared to be under the influence of alcohol. Authorities said he also attempted to shove a fourth person who tried to intervene.

According to investigators, the man threw a rolled-up newspaper at the group and knocked one victim’s yarmulke to the ground before walking away along Crown Street toward downtown.

Police reviewed surveillance footage from the area and said it corroborated the victims’ accounts. The investigation remains ongoing, and authorities are seeking information that could help identify the suspect.

No injuries were reported.

Renewed debate over the kashrus status of conventional broiler chickens has once again stirred discussion in the Torah world, prompting a direct inquiry to one of the generation’s foremost halachic authorities. During a recent visit to Rav Moshe Sternbuch, Rav Shlomo Yedidya Zafrani, Av Beis Din of Kesser Torah, sought clarification on the issue amid a fresh campaign challenging the permissibility of commonly consumed poultry.

The question arose during Rav Zafrani’s visit to Rav Sternbuch’s home, where the dayan raised concerns about the renewed efforts by certain groups to discourage consumption of standard broiler chickens and revive support for the Brakel breed as the preferred alternative.

Rav Zaafrani reviewed the background of the controversy, reminding Rav Sternbuch of the heated debate that erupted several years ago when advocates of the Brakel chicken sought to promote its use while casting doubt on the status of conventional poultry commonly found in Jewish homes.

He noted that at the time, Rav Sternbuch issued a clear and unequivocal ruling permitting the continued consumption of standard broiler chickens without concern. Rav Zafrani further recalled that Rav Sternbuch had taken the unusual step of dispatching a knowledgeable representative to personally investigate the relevant shechitah and kashrus procedures, ultimately confirming that there was no basis for concern.

The dayan also informed Rav Sternbuch that he had relied on that ruling when authoring his own halachic works and had published the permissive ruling in his seforim based on Rav Sternbuch’s guidance.

In light of recent advertisements and public campaigns once again calling for the prohibition of conventional poultry and generating concern among consumers, Rav Zafrani asked whether there had been any change in the halachic assessment and whether Rav Sternbuch continued to stand by his original position.

Rav Sternbuch responded immediately and emphatically, declaring: “מה שהיה – היה.”

With those words, Rav Sternbuch made clear that his original ruling remains fully in force. According to the account of the meeting, he reaffirmed that the accepted broiler chickens consumed throughout the Torah-observant community remain permissible, and that the longstanding ruling relied upon by many leading rabbanim continues to stand without modification.

His response was widely interpreted as a decisive rejection of renewed attempts to cast doubt on the kashrus of conventional poultry and as reassurance to the public that there is no need to be alarmed by the latest wave of claims surrounding the issue.

{Matzav.com}

Oil prices moved lower on Thursday, June 4, after Israel and Lebanon confirmed they had agreed to implement a ceasefire, a development that traders interpreted as a potential step toward calming a region that has spent months on the brink of a wider conflict. The announcement, reported by Reuters, prompted investors to unwind part of the geopolitical risk premium that has been embedded in energy markets throughout the war.

Early trading saw Brent crude, the international benchmark, fall approximately 0.9% to $96.92 a barrel, while West Texas Intermediate (WTI), the U.S. benchmark, declined to roughly $95.24 a barrel. The retreat came just one day after both benchmarks had surged nearly 2% following renewed fighting in the region, including reported Iranian strikes in Kuwait and additional U.S. military operations near the Strait of Hormuz.

The reaction underscores a reality that has defined global energy markets since late February: oil prices are being driven as much by military developments and diplomatic signals as by traditional supply-and-demand fundamentals.

At the center of investor concerns remains the Strait of Hormuz, one of the world’s most important shipping routes. A significant portion of global crude exports pass through the narrow waterway each day. Any threat to traffic through Hormuz immediately raises fears of supply disruptions, pushing oil prices higher and increasing costs throughout the global economy.

The ongoing U.S.-Israeli conflict with Iran has repeatedly raised concerns that shipping through the strait could be interrupted. Every escalation has sent traders scrambling to price in the possibility of reduced oil flows, while every sign of de-escalation has triggered the opposite reaction.

The Israel-Lebanon ceasefire is being viewed as more than a local agreement. Investors see it as a possible indication that broader diplomatic efforts may be gaining traction throughout the region. Reports that discussions between Washington and Tehran could continue have further strengthened hopes that the conflict may eventually move toward a negotiated resolution.

Should those talks produce meaningful progress, traders believe the risk of a prolonged disruption to shipping through Hormuz would decline significantly, potentially removing one of the largest drivers of oil-market volatility.

However, supply fundamentals continue to provide support for crude prices.

According to figures cited by Reuters, inventories at Cushing, Oklahoma, the delivery hub for WTI futures contracts, fell by approximately 583,000 barrels to around 22.4 million barrels. Falling inventories indicate relatively tight supply conditions and help explain why Thursday’s decline remained relatively modest despite the positive geopolitical developments.

In other words, even if fears of war begin to ease, underlying supply constraints may prevent oil prices from falling dramatically.

For American consumers, the significance extends far beyond commodity markets.

Energy costs have remained one of the most persistent contributors to inflation. According to the Bureau of Labor Statistics, consumer prices increased 3.8% over the twelve months ending in April, with energy representing a significant portion of that increase. Higher oil prices eventually affect gasoline, diesel fuel, airline tickets, shipping costs, and the price of countless goods transported throughout the economy.

A sustained decline in crude prices would likely provide relief at the pump and help ease pressure on household budgets during the summer travel season.

Businesses would also benefit.

Industries heavily dependent on fuel—including airlines, trucking companies, logistics providers, delivery services, manufacturers, and agricultural operations—closely monitor crude prices because energy represents one of their largest operating expenses. Greater stability in the Middle East could allow these businesses to plan with greater confidence after months of uncertainty and fluctuating costs.

Yet few analysts believe the danger has passed.

The ceasefire announced between Israel and Lebanon is not a comprehensive peace agreement, nor does it directly resolve the broader conflict involving Iran. Market participants have learned over the past several months that periods of calm can quickly give way to renewed escalation.

A breakdown in talks, additional military action near Hormuz, or a broader regional confrontation could rapidly send oil prices higher again.

There is also an important political development unfolding in Washington that investors are watching closely.

On Wednesday, the U.S. House of Representatives approved a resolution aimed at limiting the president’s authority to continue military operations against Iran without additional congressional authorization. While the measure faces significant obstacles in the Senate and is unlikely to become law in its current form, it reflects growing political pressure against an open-ended conflict.

For traders, that political signal matters.

The willingness of lawmakers to challenge continued military engagement suggests that support for a prolonged war may be weakening. Combined with diplomatic efforts and the Israel-Lebanon ceasefire, the congressional action has contributed to growing expectations that the conflict could eventually move toward a negotiated outcome.

For now, energy markets are cautiously embracing a more optimistic scenario.

Oil remains expensive, geopolitical risks remain elevated, and the conflict itself remains unresolved. But the combination of a ceasefire, ongoing diplomatic discussions, and growing political pressure for de-escalation has given traders a reason to believe the worst-case scenarios may become less likely.

Whether that optimism proves justified will depend largely on diplomacy. If regional leaders can transform a temporary ceasefire into a broader framework for stability, the result could be lower energy prices, reduced inflationary pressure, and greater confidence across global markets. If not, oil traders may once again find themselves pricing in the possibility of another major disruption to the world’s most important energy corridor.

JBizNews Desk — Middle East

© JBizNews.com All Rights Reserved. Reproduction or distribution without written permission is prohibited.

Following months of discussions with leading roshei yeshivah, poskim, and Torah leaders, a significant decision has been reached in the world of shidduchim: broad support has been granted to “Hashadchan,” a supervised shidduch platform that operates through a monitored telephone system and digital network.

Earlier this week, shortly before departing for the Keren Olam HaTorah fundraising mission in the United States, Slabodka Rosh Yeshivah Rav Dov Landau met with the organization’s leadership and members of its spiritual oversight committee. During the meeting, he received a detailed presentation outlining the platform’s operations, supervision procedures, and security safeguards, and subsequently offered his blessing for the initiative.

Sources familiar with the process told Matzav.com that the decision followed an extended period during which leading Torah authorities carefully evaluated the changes that have taken place in the shidduch world in recent years, particularly the growing use of digital platforms. One of the primary issues under discussion was the widespread circulation of photographs during the shidduch process and concerns over the lack of control families often have over how those images are shared.

According to individuals involved in the discussions, the transmission of photographs among shadchanim, acquaintances, and other parties became a major focus. To address those concerns, the platform developed a specialized security feature known as the “Vault,” which prevents users from downloading, saving, or forwarding images. Photographs become viewable only after approval from both sides and may be accessed only a limited number of times and for a restricted period.

Another distinctive aspect of the initiative is its emphasis on parental involvement. Access to the database is limited exclusively to parents through a controlled supervision system. Once an initial match is identified, the process is transferred to a certified shadchan affiliated with the program. Yeshivah bochurim and seminary students are not directly involved in the search process itself.

Following the approval of the initiative, a spiritual oversight committee was established to guide and monitor its development. The committee operates under the direction of the project’s presidents, Rav Yehoshua Eichenstein, Rosh Yeshivah of Yad Aharon, and Rav Amram Fried. Other members include Rav Dovid Eisenstein, one of the roshei yeshivah of Lehavas HaTorah in Beitar Illit, and veteran shadchan and educator Rabbi Hillel Mann.

A substantial number of prominent rabbinic figures from both the Litvishe and Sephardic communities have already expressed support for the project. Among them are Rav Berel Povarsky, Rav Yitzchok Zilberstein, Rav Asher Weiss, Rav Shlomo Yehudah Zafrani, Rav Mordechai Shmuel Edelstein, Rav Shimon Galei, Rav Chaim Peretz Berman, Rav Yehudah Silman, and others.

The initiative was first presented approximately a year ago to Rav Moshe Hillel Hirsch, who voiced his support for the concept. More recently, Rav Dovid Cohen also endorsed the project.

At the same time, representatives of the initiative have spent recent weeks presenting the model to rabbanim and educators in a number of chassidic communities, particularly within Belz and Vizhnitz. Leaders in those circles have reportedly expressed interest in the platform, and discussions are underway regarding the possibility of integrating it into the shidduch systems used by their educational institutions, under the guidance of the respective rabbinic leadership and in cooperation with the organization’s administration.

According to the organizers, the platform has already helped facilitate the establishment of more than 320 Jewish homes throughout Israel.

Next week, the leadership of the initiative is scheduled to meet with Rav Meir Tzvi Bergman, the senior member of the Moetzes Gedolei HaTorah, to seek his blessing for the continued growth of the project and its planned expansion both in Israel and abroad.