A federal judge has temporarily blocked key parts of a New York law that sought to prohibit federal immigration officers from wearing face masks and require them to display visible identification while conducting official operations, ruling that the state likely lacks the authority to regulate how federal agents perform their duties.

On Monday, U.S. District Judge Mae D’Agostino of the Northern District of New York issued a preliminary injunction preventing enforcement of those provisions as the lawsuit challenging the law moves through the courts.

In her decision, D’Agostino concluded that the challenged sections are likely unconstitutional because they intrude on federal law enforcement authority. The ruling applies to operations conducted by agencies including Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE), the FBI, the Drug Enforcement Administration (DEA), and U.S. Customs and Border Protection (CBP).

The judge wrote that establishing policies governing the conduct of federal officers is exclusively the responsibility of the federal government, meaning New York cannot impose its own requirements on federal agents carrying out official responsibilities.

“New York cannot impose its own uniform requirements on federal agents simply because it disagrees with how the Federal Government is exercising its authority,” the ruling stated.

New York Gov. Kathy Hochul and Attorney General Letitia James criticized the court’s decision and said they are exploring their next legal steps.

“While the court enjoined enforcement of New York’s mask ban, we stand firm in our belief that masked agents do not make New York safer and our offices are reviewing all legal options at this time,” the pair said in a joint statement.

Although D’Agostino blocked the mask and identification provisions, she declined to halt another section of the law that prohibits local law enforcement agencies in New York from participating in certain federal immigration enforcement efforts through 287(g) agreements.

According to the ruling, federal law makes participation in those immigration partnerships voluntary, allowing states to decide whether local agencies will cooperate.

“The State’s refusal to cooperate in the immigration context—a possibility contemplated by the relevant federal statutes—does not constitute discrimination against the federal government,” the ruling stated.

Hochul and James praised that portion of the decision, arguing that local police resources should remain focused on community policing rather than federal immigration enforcement.

“As we have said from the start, New York’s ban on 287(g) agreements is legal and will keep our communities safe. Local law enforcement should be focused on local matters, and New York taxpayers should not have to foot the bill for any collaboration with ICE,” their statement read.

{Matzav.com}