Retired Gen. David Petraeus said that even if the Trump administration proceeds with military strikes against Iran amid growing tensions between President Donald Trump and Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, such action would not succeed in removing the Iranian regime.

Speaking in an interview broadcast Sunday on the “Cats Roundtable” radio program with host John Catsimatidis on WABC 770 AM, the former CIA director described Khamenei as deeply entrenched in his views and unlikely to compromise on key issues. He said the Iranian leader is “such an ideologue, he’s so hard-lined, that it appears that he may not budge on the issues that really matter,” a posture that could lead Trump to authorize force.

“Look, candidly, I’m all for taking the missile program down further or [bringing] damage to the security forces, but we should be very clear-eyed,” Petraeus said. “This will not bring about a regime change, sadly.”

Petraeus argued that Iran’s supreme leader has shown little capacity to engage meaningfully in nuclear negotiations. American and Iranian officials met Tuesday in Geneva, Switzerland, to discuss Tehran’s nuclear activities, but as of early Sunday no agreement had been reached.

He described Iran’s nuclear program as a serious threat to U.S. allies in the region. According to Petraeus, Iran’s capabilities are “so threatening to our partners and allies in the region, including Israel, and the support that [Iran] provide to these murderous proxies like Hezbollah, Hamas, the Houthis and Shia militia in Iraq.”

“So, unless he demonstrates some flexibility, I think they’re going to be at the receiving end of a very, very substantial demonstration of American military power,” he added.

Petraeus also referenced Trump’s 10-day deadline for Tehran to reach an agreement and offer “some serious concessions, which they have not been willing to do before.”

On Thursday, Trump cautioned that Iran would face “steep consequences” if talks collapse. He had said the previous week that failure to reach a deal would be “a bad day for Iran, very bad.”

The current diplomatic window mirrors the timeline seen last June, when U.S. stealth bombers struck three Iranian uranium enrichment facilities during Operation Midnight Hammer. U.S. officials said the operation severely impaired Iran’s nuclear program, though Iranian authorities disputed that assessment.

On Friday, Trump indicated he was weighing the possibility of a limited military strike.

The United States has since reinforced its military posture in the region, sending two aircraft carrier groups while flight tracking data showed numerous American fighter jets and refueling aircraft moving toward Europe and the Middle East.

The prospect of escalation has drawn resistance on Capitol Hill. Reps. Ro Khanna (D-Calif.) and Thomas Massie (R-Ky.) announced plans to force a House vote this week on a war powers resolution that would require Trump to obtain congressional approval before launching an attack.

“Trump officials say there’s a 90% chance of strikes on Iran. He can’t without Congress,” Khanna said Wednesday in a post on the social platform X. “@RepThomasMassie & I have a War Powers Resolution to debate & vote on war before putting U.S. troops in harm’s way.”

Not all lawmakers support that effort. Reps. Mike Lawler (R-N.Y.) and Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.) said Friday they oppose advancing a war powers resolution.

“We respect and defend Congress’s constitutional role in matters of war,” they said in a joint statement. “Oversight and debate are absolutely vital. However, this resolution would restrict the flexibility needed to respond to real and evolving threats and risks signaling weakness at a dangerous moment.”

{Matzav.com}