Senior aides to President Donald Trump are said to be considering the possibility that Israel would carry out a military strike on Iran before the United States enters the conflict, according to two individuals familiar with internal deliberations who spoke to Politico.

According to the report, some administration officials believe that if Israel were to attack first and Iran responded with retaliation, it could build broader domestic backing for subsequent American military involvement. The calculation, these sources suggested, is that US voters would be more inclined to support a strike if either the United States or a close ally were attacked beforehand.

“There’s thinking in and around the administration that the politics are a lot better if the Israelis go first and alone and the Iranians retaliate against us, and give us more reason to take action,” one of the sources told Politico. Both individuals spoke on condition of anonymity to describe private conversations.

As diplomatic prospects appear increasingly uncertain in Washington, attention has shifted toward the timing and form of any potential military move. While some officials reportedly prefer that Israel initiate action independently, the sources indicated that a coordinated US-Israel operation may ultimately be the more realistic outcome.

Asked about the report, White House spokesperson Anna Kelly declined to address specifics, saying, “The media may continue to speculate on the president’s thinking all they want, but only President Trump knows what he may or may not do.” The Israeli embassy in Washington did not provide a comment.

In a separate development, The Wall Street Journal reported, citing diplomats and analysts, that Iran’s nuclear program has not advanced significantly since the June conflict, particularly following Operation Midnight Hammer, when the United States targeted three key Iranian nuclear facilities.

The flurry of reports came as Trump’s senior negotiators, special envoy Steve Witkoff and his son-in-law Jared Kushner, prepared to travel to Geneva on Thursday in an effort to reach an agreement with Iranian officials.

Addressing the issue during Tuesday night’s State of the Union address, President Trump said that last June’s strikes on Iranian nuclear facilities had “obliterated” the country’s nuclear program. He also accused Tehran of killing more than 32,000 protesters and warned that it is attempting to revive its nuclear efforts while advancing missile systems capable of striking Europe and potentially the United States.

“We’re in negotiations with them. They want to make a deal, but we haven’t heard those secret words, ‘We will never have a nuclear weapon’. My preference is to solve this problem through diplomacy. But one thing is certain: I will never allow the world’s number one sponsor of terror to have a nuclear weapon. Can’t let that happen.”

On Wednesday, Vice President JD Vance said US intelligence shows Iran is working to rebuild elements of its nuclear program and reiterated that Washington will not tolerate a nuclear-armed Iran.

He emphasized that the administration’s first choice remains diplomacy, though other measures are on the table if talks fail.

“The principle is very simple, Iran cannot have a nuclear weapon. If they try to rebuild a nuclear weapon, that causes problems for us. In fact, we’ve seen evidence that they have tried to do exactly that. So the President is sending those negotiators to try to address that problem,” Vance said.

He added, “As the President has said repeatedly, he wants to address that problem diplomatically, but of course the President has other options as well.”

Despite the diplomatic outreach, the Politico article noted that some figures close to the president expect military action is inevitable, quoting one source as saying that “we’re going to bomb them.”

Potential targets in any strike would likely include Iranian nuclear facilities—some of which were previously hit in June—as well as elements of Iran’s ballistic missile network, viewed by Israel as an immediate security threat, according to the report.

The possibility of directly targeting the Iranian leadership has also been discussed. A so-called “decapitation strike” aimed at Supreme Leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei remains among the theoretical options. However, Iran’s governing structure is built to ensure continuity, with multiple layers of authority, especially within the Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps.

Military planners acknowledge that any such campaign could stretch on for days or even weeks and could produce uncertain consequences, particularly if it relies heavily on airstrikes.

{Matzav.com}