Iranian intelligence officials quietly reached out to the CIA to explore possible terms for halting the U.S. and Israeli military campaign against their country shortly after the attacks began, according to a report, even as Tehran has publicly rejected negotiations with President Donald Trump.

According to Middle Eastern officials and representatives of a Western government who spoke anonymously to The New York Times, operatives tied to Iran’s Ministry of Intelligence contacted the CIA indirectly through the intelligence service of a third country just one day after the strikes began.

Despite the contact, officials in Washington are doubtful that either side is ready to seriously pursue negotiations in the immediate future.

Even so, the reported outreach has raised questions about whether Iran’s leadership would be capable of implementing any ceasefire arrangement while the country’s power structure is being shaken by ongoing Israeli strikes targeting top officials.

Neither the White House nor Iranian officials responded to requests from the Times for comment on the report, while the CIA declined to comment.

According to the report, Israeli officials have urged the United States not to engage with the Iranian overture, as Israel intends to continue its extended campaign aimed at crippling Iran’s military capabilities and potentially undermining the stability of its ruling regime.

President Trump signaled Tuesday that negotiations were unlikely, writing on social media that it was now “too late” to pursue talks with Tehran.

Later in the day, while speaking with reporters, Trump noted that many of the Iranian officials the United States once viewed as potential negotiating partners had been killed in the strikes.

“Most of the people we had in mind are dead,” Trump said. “Pretty soon, we are not going to know anybody.”

The outreach from Tehran highlights a major dilemma facing the Trump administration as it considers its longer-term strategy toward Iran: what kind of leadership might take shape in Tehran if the current government weakens or collapses.

At the beginning of the conflict, Trump suggested that widespread unrest among the Iranian public could produce an entirely new leadership. More recently, however, his comments have suggested a more practical approach in which new figures might rise from within the existing political structure.

Officials familiar with the administration’s thinking say any agreement to stop the bombing campaign would likely require Iran to abandon—or sharply scale back—its ballistic missile and nuclear programs, while also ending its backing of proxy groups such as Hezbollah.

In return, Trump has suggested that Iran’s remaining leaders might be permitted to retain certain levels of economic and political power.

Trump recently pointed to developments in Venezuela as a possible model for reshaping leadership in Iran.

“What we did in Venezuela, I think, is the perfect scenario,” Trump said in an interview Sunday with The New York Times. “Leaders can be picked.”

Some analysts, however, caution that such an outcome may be difficult to achieve.

Steven A. Cook, a Middle East expert at the Council on Foreign Relations, said Trump’s recent remarks could reflect differing views between Washington and Israel about the ultimate objectives of the military campaign.

Israel, he suggested, does not want the United States pursuing what Cook described to the Times as a “Venezuela-like solution to change in Iran,” which could involve figures tied to Iran’s Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps, an organization that controls large segments of the country’s economy.

Meanwhile, Israeli strikes against Iran’s leadership have continued.

On Tuesday, Israeli forces targeted a compound where senior Iranian clerics had gathered to discuss selecting a successor to Iran’s Supreme Leader, Ayatollah Ali Khamenei, who was killed in an airstrike on Saturday.

Before the strikes began, the CIA reportedly compiled an intelligence assessment analyzing several possible leadership scenarios that could emerge in Iran following a joint U.S.-Israeli military campaign.

Officials who were briefed on the analysis said none of the potential outcomes carried a high level of certainty, given the many unknowns surrounding Iran’s complex political system.

{Matzav.com}