A tense and stormy discussion unfolded overnight in Israel’s security cabinet over the High Court’s involvement in decisions regarding large-scale protests and access for mispallelim at the Kosel against the backdrop of ongoing security threats and Home Front Command restrictions.

Several ministers sharply criticized the court’s intervention, insisting that such decisions must remain solely in the hands of security authorities. Justice Minister Yariv Levin said, “A decision must be made that it is not the court that determines, but only the Home Front Command.” He added that the police must follow the directives of security officials alone, stating, “It is inconceivable that a court ignores the security authority.”

National Security Minister Itamar Ben Gvir echoed that position but stressed the importance of equal treatment. “Where the Home Front Command permits, there cannot be discrimination between Habima protesters and those ascending to the Mount or coming to the Kosel,” he said. He added that once demonstrations were permitted in Tel Aviv, authorities should explore ways to allow tefillah at the Kosel and Har Habayis in a secure and responsible manner.

Foreign Minister Gideon Sa’ar supported Levin’s remarks but emphasized that the ultimate authority lies with the government. “It is the government that decides, not the Home Front Command. Our considerations are broader,” he said.

Prime Minister Binyomin Netanyahu also criticized the High Court’s conduct, saying, “They have created a situation where everything is now open.” He added that he intends to convey a clear message that the Home Front Command must be the deciding authority on security matters, questioning, “How can a court intervene in this?”

Levin reinforced Netanyahu’s concerns, warning of the potential consequences. “They bear no responsibility — if civilians are harmed by a missile strike, that responsibility falls on us,” he said.

Ben Gvir expanded his criticism to include the state prosecution, arguing that it is not faithfully representing the government’s position. “The prosecution is also rebelling and is not presenting our position to the court,” he said, noting that he felt compelled to appear personally in order to present his stance. “This is not normal — the prosecution is supposed to represent us.”

Deputy Attorney General Sharon Afek responded by clarifying that no final ruling has yet been issued by the High Court and that an additional hearing is scheduled for Thursday.