As Israel continues its military campaign and ground operations in Lebanon, former Prime Minister and former IDF Chief of Staff Ehud Barak delivered a blistering critique of Prime Minister Binyamin Netanyahu and his government, accusing them of deceiving the public about the war’s progress and achievements.

Barak argued that Israeli leaders are presenting a distorted picture of the campaign against Hezbollah while the country faces what he described as an unprecedented political and security crisis. He maintained that the military is being pushed beyond its limits and that the government is fostering unrealistic expectations regarding the impact of its actions in Lebanon.

“This is a government that misleads the public; Netanyahu is counting bodies,” Barak claimed without evidence. “They didn’t kill 800 terrorists, nor 400 terrorists-it’s all nonsense. During funerals in Israel, Netanyahu said that we were delivering a crushing blow to Hezbollah. He said that Hezbollah had been pushed back by decades.”

Rejecting the government’s portrayal of the campaign, Barak contended that claims of significantly weakening Hezbollah are detached from reality. He said the organization cannot be eliminated without a full conquest of Lebanon, a scenario he described as neither practical nor achievable.

Barak also criticized the destruction of Lebanese villages and statements suggesting a prolonged Israeli presence in southern Lebanon. In his view, such actions do not diminish Hezbollah’s influence. Instead, he argued, they strengthen the group’s standing within Lebanon and weaken opportunities for diplomatic progress.

According to Barak, every Israeli military operation inside Lebanese territory enhances Hezbollah’s image among segments of the Lebanese population, who increasingly view the organization as “the defender of Lebanon.”

The former premier further asserted that Iran and its regional allies have been successful in applying pressure on Washington. He said the only viable path forward is a coordinated international effort involving Israel, Lebanon, Saudi Arabia, France, the United States, and Syria to strip Hezbollah of any legitimacy for maintaining an armed force.

Drawing on Israel’s past experience in southern Lebanon, Barak questioned the rationale behind the current military strategy and warned against repeating mistakes made during Israel’s previous presence in the security zone.

“There is a deep concern that going there is not connected to practical considerations,” Barak said. “The real question regarding the withdrawal from Lebanon is not why it took place in 2000, but why it did not take place 15 years earlier. Hezbollah developed because we were inside Lebanon.”

Barak concluded by arguing that Israel’s leadership has lost sight of the broader purpose of military action. He said warfare must ultimately serve diplomatic and political objectives, and asserted that either Naftali Bennett or Gadi Eisenkot would be better suited than Netanyahu to lead the country.

{Matzav.com}